Harappa to Japan: The Story of Curry & How It Got Its Name
Harappa to Japan: The Story of Curry & How It Got Its Name
A s a Bengali who grew up in Goa, fish curry is not just a dish; it is a sentiment. Whether it was Bengal’s maacher jhol or Goa’s xitt codi , I grew up savouring fish curry as my staple lunch for years. And even when I left my hometown for college, the distinct flavour of these spicy, savoury curries didn’t leave my taste buds.
But then that’s the thing about curries; they have a way of leaving one drooling at their memory, especially in India, where meals are rarely complete without some kind of curry. From dhansak and korma to rogan josh , kuzhambu and vindaloo , the many shades of this delectable concoction have been warming the cockles of Indian hearts for generations.
Photo Source: Surya Indian Kitchen & Catering
Interestingly, there is no such word as ‘curry’ in any of India’s many languages. So what exactly is ‘curry’? And when and where did it originate? Thanks to two hardworking archaeologists, advanced microscopes and a pile of (extremely old) dirty pots, at least some of these questions may have been answered.
In 2010, archaeologists Arunima Kashyap and Steve Webber of Washington State University made history at the Harappan excavation site of Farmana (in Haryana) when they used the method of starch grain analysis to identify the residue of the world’s ‘oldest’ proto-curry from the shards of a handi (a clay pot).
The Harappan excavabtion site at Farmana. Photo Source: Washington State University Extracting molecules from the shard’s surfaces and mapping them in the lab for clues, they found traces of eggplants (brinjals), ginger, turmeric and salt in them—the last three being key ingredients, even today, of a typical Indian curry. (Note: Archaeologists also found millet, wheat, lentils, barley, mung bean, bananas and a ‘carbonised clove of garlic’ at the site.)
Wanting to confirm the find, Arunima and Steve took to their own kitchens in Washington. “We got traditional recipes, cooked dishes, then examined the residues to see how the structures broke down,” Steve told Slate . The results matched what they had unearthed at the Rakhigarhi excavation. “Then we knew we had the oldest record of ginger and turmeric.”
Steve Webber (left) and Arunima Kashyap. Photo Source: Washington State University / Portland State University In other words, 4,000 years ago, the Harappans were probably eating almost exactly what you ate last night! As for the origins of the word ‘curry’, it remains disputed. In his book, The Oxford Companion to Food , historian Alan Davidson credits it to the Tamil word kari , “or spiced sauce, which was originally a thin, soup-like, spiced dressing served in southern India”.
On the other hand, food historian Lizzie Collingham traces it to Portuguese-ruled Goa of the early 1500s. In her book Curry: A Tale of Cooks and Conquerors , Collingham explains that the words kari or caril likely referred to “a spiced dish of sautéed vegetables and meat.”.
In fact, there is a recipe for kari in a 16th-century Portuguese cookbook on royal banquets written by maritime traders.
A 16th-century Dutch traveller, Jan Huyghen van Linschoten, also described the way caril was eaten in Goa. He wrote: “Most of their fish is eaten with rice, which they seeth in broth, which they put upon the rice, and is somewhat sour as if it were sodden in gooseberries or unripe grapes, but it tasteth well, and is called Carriel, which is their daily meat.”
Another 17th-century traveller, Pietro Della Valle from Rome, described caril in his accounts as broths “made with butter, the pulp of Indian nuts . . . and all sorts of spices, particularly cardamom and ginger . . . besides herbs, fruits and a thousand other condiments . . . poured in good quantity . . . upon boiled rice.”
So it was probably the Portuguese who set the ball rolling by introducing the word caril to the world. Interestingly, prawn curry is still called ‘Caril de Camarao’ in some places in Goa.
Goan-style Caril De Camarao. Photo Source: Celebration In My Kitchen Meanwhile, back in India, the kari continued to evolve into a plethora of local and hyperlocal variations. Persian influence led to the addition of yoghurt in meat gravies; cream and pureed nuts were added in Lucknow to produce decadent kormas ; and chillies from South America (introduced by the Portuguese) gradually found their way into south Indian curries—it goes without saying that our forefathers took to this new seasoning with immense gusto!
But how did this huge range of dishes end up being lumped together under one moniker? For that, we have to look to the British and their colonising mission. Wherever the British went, taking with them bureaucrats, soldiers, clerks, cooks, indentured labourers, and other cogs in the wheels of the Raj, so did the local curries of India (like the Railway Mutton Curry). But with typical insensitivity and willful ignorance, they replaced the varied recipes and diverse eating cultures with a homogenous notion of an Indian ‘curry’.
In 1747, Hannah Glasse published the first curry recipe in English under the title of ‘To Make a Currey The Indian Way’. By the late 19th century, commercial curry powder was being widely sold in England, even though it had little resemblance to anything being used in India. In fact, Indians rarely depended on a single powder to make their versions of the dish, instead relying on a melange of spices specific to the recipe.
Receipt ‘To make a Currey the Indian Way’ from The Art of Cookery by Hannah Glasse, 1758. Photo Source: Wikipedia Indians who rose to prominence in the international culinary arena would later go on to denounce this reduction of their country’s rich cuisine to store-bought mixes.
“What you don’t need is curry powder,” wrote Madhur Jaffrey, the doyen of Indian cooking in America, in 1974, in her book An Invitation to Indian Cookery . She added that “no Indian ever uses curry powder,” nor would they mix their own, since then every dish would taste the same.
An advertisement for Curry Masala in the UK, 1910. Photo Source: Advertising Archives However, there is also a different legacy of this culinary intermingling, courtesy Indians who migrated to England and sister colonies. In lands far away from India (South Africa, Guyana, Maldives, Fiji, Japan, Trinidad, Mauritius, Suriname etc.), Indian immigrants used local ingredients to create the closest approximation of loved and remembered curries from ‘back home’.
Ever since these reclaimed and reinvented curries have continued to conquer all wherever they have settled. Like the Indian diaspora itself, they are true to their origins yet creative, full of surprising flavours and depths, and yes, infinitely adaptable.
Take, for instance, South Africa’s Bunny Chow. Essentially a piping hot Indian-style curry housed inside a hollow loaf of bread, Durban’s bunny chow is a much-loved street snack in South Africa. In fact, according to the Johannesburg Times (the country’s newspaper of record), it is an “integral part of South Africa’s culinary heritage.” Read more about the Indian origins of this delightful fusion dish here .
South Africans enjoying Bunny Chow. Source: Bunny Chow Competition In Japan, Nakamuraya Indo-Karii remains a crowd favourite. Famously christened the ‘taste of love and revolution’ by Tokyo newspapers, this Indian style chicken curry was introduced in Japan by freedom fighter Rash Behari Bose. With over 6 billion helpings being served annually, it is still made according to Bose’s original recipe and supplied as packaged ready-to-eat meals to supermarkets across the country!
Nakamuraya’s Indo-Karii (left), Rash Behari Bose with his Japanese wife, Toshiko (right). Photo Source: Nakamuraya Also Read : How an Indian Freedom Fighter’s Curry Became a Sensation in Japan
In Trinidad and Tobago, a country whose 40 per cent population is of Indian origin, the role of dhaniya (coriander) in curries has been substituted by bandhaniya (a local herb called shadow beni)—a fascinating example of indigenisation that says a lot about how Indians innovated to hold on to their culinary culture even when they were “saat samundar paar” (seven seas away)!
So the next time you order your favourite curry, know that you’re not just satiating a craving—you’re tasting a bit of ancient culinary history.
And if all that food talk has made you hungry, here is a curated list of six little-known Indian curries that you need to tick off your foodie bucket list! 1. Mirkapaya Mamsam: A wonderfully piquant mutton curry from Andhra Pradesh that uses three different types of chillies in three different forms.
2. Posto Murgi: A much-loved local speciality in West Bengal, this lightly spiced curry involves slow-cooking chicken in poppy seed paste.
3. Thalagam: A tamarind-based curry made using seven vegetables that is served in Tamil Nadu, especially during the Thiruvathirai festival.
4. Squid Ambotik: A sweet-sour-spicy gravy with calamari which, unlike most Goan curries, doesn’t have coconut.
5. Nadru Yakhni: A Kashmiri delicacy, this is a creamy yoghurt-based curry with succulent lotus stems.
6. Kumurat Diya Hanhor Mangxo: This Assamese preparation is an aromatic curry made of duck meat and bottle gourd, spiced up with freshly ground pepper.
Also Read : The Story of Biryani: How This Exotic Dish Came, Saw and Conquered India!
Edited by Saiqua Sultan
Like this story? Or have something to share? Write to us: email@example.com, or connect with us on Facebook and Twitter .
cook books Stirling Area – Mount Lawley | 1219795366
Well-loved cook books that need a new home.
Movida Rustica by Frank Camorra and Richard Cornish. $35. Spanish traditional recipes.
Made in Italy: Food and stories by Giorgio Locatelli. $25
Qmin: A fresh new approach to Indian cuisine by Anil Ashokan. $40.
My Italian heart by Guy Grossi. $35
Balance and harmony: The secrets of Asian cooking by Neil Perry. $55
Rockpool by Neil Perry. $30.
Discount if you buy more than one 🙂
If you can see this ad, the item is still available, no need to ask if it is.
Please write your own question/enquiry, don’t just send one of the auto-Gumtree ones. I’ve received and answered so many of those and then got no response that I just can’t be bothered with them any more.
I think this is a pretty reasonable price, please don’t bother with ridiculous offers.
I don’t answer calls from blocked/private phone numbers. Text is best most of the time.
Thanks for looking.
How is the growth in India and China
How is the growth in India and China Safe and Secure Drugstore Become our customer and save your money! Click Here!!! United CEO testifies before House committee Photographer captures the nalorex order online mastercard usa moment 5,000 birds create an exclamation mark formation in the sky Old people who lift weights ‘live for longer’ Paul Ince says Liverpool will always rue losing title race even if they win Champions League Homes That Sold for Around $1,000,000 Post Office bosses have mebeverine tablets no prescription spent 18 MILLION fighting legal battles against staff My Husband Wore Really Tight Shorts to the Eclipse Party Filling up on petrol station offices Arsenal ‘plot shock move’ for Tottenham defenderToby Alderweireld BBC pension fund loses up to 9m on getting femring online investments in US carmaker Tesla X-Men’s “Dark Phoenix” cast generic desvenlafaxine discount cheap unsure over future as Fox franchise ends Mom left shocked after kid’s t-shirt arrives in the mail with ‘F**k The Police’ printed on it 9 New Books We Recommend This Week The Queen has made 7.7million from her love of horse racing Australian explorer who collapsed and nearly died up Mount Everest reveals his horror injuries Trump dances with danger in Middle East by deploying aircraft carrier and a peace plan 7 cheap apetamin-p uk Dance Performances to See in N.Y.C. This Weekend Homes for Sale in Brooklyn and Manhattan Man, 57, ‘had sex with girl, 14, and gave her a cellphone so deniban for sale cheap he could send her explicit texts’ Javid accused of human fly-tipping over decision on… Britain’s Got Talent Amanda Holden, 48, goes braless in plunging ballgown amid Ofcom probe Your Kids Think Youre Addicted to Your Phone Europe’s old guard is punished by voters demanding change Justin Langer calls on fans to show respect to David Warner and Steve Smith Kim Kardashian reveals ‘concerns’ over Khloe and Tristan My Favorite Artwork | Jordan Casteel Exclusive for MoS readers Berlin, Colditz and Dam Busters tour with TV’s James Holland The angry emoji message at Facebooks meeting Dementia, but Prettier Mike Ashleys Sports Direct warehouse tipped to be sold to a Malaysian fund Wellness For the Culture Huaweis European Customers Are Put on Hold by U.S. Ban Indian rival slams Uber’s business model Joe Pavelski Sparks the Sharks, Whether Hes on the Ice or Not Tradies from overseas ruthlessly mock Australias warning to stop work when its too cold Hollywood Sighting Brain scans can PREDICT teen depression weeks before their moods change, study suggests Outgoing Chelsea captain Gary Cahill proud to lift Europa League before taking on new challenge Office romance lifts us out of a slump Rob Kardashian shares sweet clip of daughter Dream, two, wishing him ‘good night’ and ‘sweat dreams’ Sussexes are to split off from charity foundation they set up with William and Kate Corbyn ally is recorded claiming that the Israeli mail order procyclidine embassy is manufacturing anti-Semitism crisis Mom left shocked after kid’s t-shirt arrives in the mail with ‘F**k The Police’ printed on it Ferrari unveils the 211mph SF90 Stradale – its first plug-in generic pripsen online otc hybrid supercar Airports in the U.S. are introducing antimicrobial security trays to stop the spread of disease Which Cannes Films Will Factor Into the Oscar Race? $2.25 Million discount tamsulosin online shop Homes in New York, Rhode Island and Georgia La La Anthony has joined the cast of the Beverly Hills 90210 reboot Bus mail order olmesartan store usa driver tries to MOW down a pedestrian deliberately blocking his vehicle from getting past Kawi, From Momofuku, Takes Korean Food Head On Model Chloe Ayling breaks down in tears as she is grilled by Italian court over kidnapping ITV brings back classic game shows Bullseye, Strike It Lucky and Play Your Cards Right Pelosi blasts Facebook for doctored how to order apetamin-p australia video In Texas, the Land of Football, Its Rugby to the Rescue Readers Respond Does It Matter That skelaxin price philippines Tiger Woods and President Trump Seem Tight? Sanderss Education Plan Renews Debate Over Charter Schools and Segregation Sophie Turner on that coffee cup and why she’s done with Sansa Stark A Signal in Giant buy ciplox republic czech Earthquakes That Could Save Lives Etihad is launching a new anti jet lag app Puppy training classes really DO work The Pentagon’s order prandin canada pharmacy worried about China’s rare earths Watch Octavia Spencer Take a Dark Turn in Ma Angela Merkel warns against dark forces on the rise in Europe Tottenham’s journey to Madrid for order ivermectin guidelines the Champions League final was a rollercoaster ride DeepMind Can Now Beat Us at Multiplayer Games, Too A Momofuku Kitchen Where Korean Cuisine Is the Star Cannabis can leave purchase clostilbegyt in japan teenagers three years behind their classmates, study finds Gaining Strength in Spain, Snchez Emerges as Beacon for buy microgest without pres Socialism in Europe Elderly woman price of drug pulled from her walking frame, thrown to the ground and kicked in front of shoppers In All-English order genuine endometrin Champions League Final, Big Clubs Already Have Won Nissan and Renault Discuss Fiat Merger Proposal World’s most popular theme parks Airbnb will transform the Louvres Pyramid into a bedroom and let guests drink with the voltfast plus price canada Mona Lisa Serena Williams Wont Be Silenced. Her Clothes Are Doing the Talking. Kim Kardashian spends two hours talking to quadruple murderer on death row Goals Soccer Centres gloomy about the year ahead after its accounting own goal Is buy bactrim online tor this the moment for political awakening in India’s cities? The secret of price duomox canada online this women’s football powerhouse Europa League winners Chelsea touch down in London after victory against Arsenal Daily Report A Net Neutrality Setback for Facebook in India How a Fourth-String Goalie Led the Blues to the Stanley Cup Finals Women involved in vulgar public sex romp will NOT be charged Just the ticket! Britain’s best double-decker tours revealed Swiss government says coffee ‘not essential’, stockpiling to end Napoli target James Rodriguez ‘tempted by Serie A move but Madrid want to sell clamoxyl order online mastercard to Premier League’ Britain Vowed Big Changes After Grenfell Tower Burned. Why Are Thousands Stuck buying hydromet without prescription in Firetraps? Hes Not Ready to Move In. Im Not Ready to Break Up. Ma Review Octavia Spencer Serves Up Liquor, Terror and a Killer Performance Is this the new grumpy cat? Feline who permanently looks enraged – even when his owner cuddles him 2019 French Open Naomi Osaka and Simona Halep Survive Irish eyes are smiling at a Russian star Documents Suggest Prosecutors Quickly Changed Mind on Jussie Smollett Case Nxivm Trial Sex Cult Leader Confined Woman in a Room for 2 Years in Jealous Rage Desperate house buyers sleep overnight in their cars for up to 10 nights to be first in the queue Spurs star Lucas Moura texts Liverpool duo for help with UCL tickets Michael Kors Coming Soon to a Broadway Theater Near You Homeless man, 21,accused of having sex on a bus has case delayed over concerns for his mental health A Rams-Saints Rematch Is Among etoricoxib order now payment 2019 N.F.L. Schedule Highlights Bolt unveils new electric scooter model in Paris U.S. disaster aid bill blocked again as Republican objects Arum puts the boot into Anthony Joshua’s American debut against Andy Ruiz Cattle ranch that feeds its cows BEER Texas farmers swear by a secret ingredient that makes beef juicer Trump to make ‘big league’ statement on border Air delestrogen mail order pharmacy New Zealand plane is struck by lightning before emergency landing Islanders on Wrong End of Sweep This Time Nuno Espirito Santo storms out of press conference after generic thyrax purchase usa being told of Wolves’ torrid away form Cannes winner ‘Parasite’ captures rich-poor gap in ‘basic unit where can you buy isoxsuprine from of life’ director
Dosa Day – Discover the Diverse World of Dosas at Sterling Resorts
by Sterling Holidays
Story of Dosa
Popularly known as the South Indian Crepe – Dosa is relished across the country. Dosa is believed to exist since the 5th century AD and was found in the Temple streets of Udipi, Karnataka. Usually spelled as Dosa, Dosai or Dosay, it was first referred to as Dosa in Tamil literature in 1054 AD by Chalukya King Somesvara III.
Delicious and crispy, Dosa is one food that never disappoints. Generally had for breakfast, dinner and even as a quick snack, Dosas come with some great health benefits. High in carbohydrates and low in calories, they are one of the popular diet dishes. The fermenting process of making the Dosa increases the nutrient benefits. They are also rich in minerals and easily digestible.
There are a hundred ways to eat this traditional delicacy. From having it with the good-old sambar and chutney to soaking it in cheese and chicken gravy, we’ve experimented a lot with this traditional delicacy.
Varieties of Dosa
Dosa is the only Indian breakfast that has umpteen varieties across the country. From simple plain paper dosa and crispy ghee dosa to spicy masala dosa and nutrient-rich ragi dosa, this crispy crepe has taken a multitude of avatars in our cuisine.
Dosa Day at Sterling Resorts
Dosa day was celebrated across our resorts by presenting the guests with some manifold varieties of scrumptious and flavourful Dosas. Starting from the desi Paneer Masala Dosa, Mysore Masala Dosa and Raagi Dosa to the exotic Open Pizza Dosa, Egg Wrap Dosa, Cheese Dosa and Mexican Dosa. Our chefs flaunted this unique Indian Crepe by curating some fascinating colourful Dosas like Beetroot Dosa, Carrot Dosa and Green Moong Dal Dosa.
Our guests including kids had a great time cooking alongside our chefs and prepared some delicious Dosas.
Shrikant G Talageri: Hindutva or Hindu Nationalism
Monday, 9 May 2016 Hindutva or Hindu Nationalism [This article is a major extract from my article ” Sita Ram Goel, memories and ideas “, written for the Sita Ram Goel Commemoration Volume , entitled ” India’s Only Communalist “, edited by Koenraad Elst , published by Voice Of India , New Delhi, in 2005. It is dedicated to Sita Ram Goel, the great visionary without whom my books (and so many other important ones) would never have seen the light of day. I am excluding from this particular blog the first section, dealing with my association with Sita Ram Goel, and the last section “Pseudo-Hindutva”, dealing with the BJP, because the first would be too sublime, and the second too sordid, a subject for this particular blog, which is only intended to define Hindutva or Hindu Nationalist ideology, in detail and in my view. Needless to say, today, in 2016, the article, written and published in 2005, may be a bit dated, and to some people some of the discussion may sound rambling or irrelevant. And my opinions, on some minor points, may have mellowed or become more refined. Nevertheless, as a preliminary and more or less comprehensive outline of my ideology, I want it on the internet. I will only mention here, for reasons which will become obvious further on, the first paragraph of the article: “I first became acquainted with Sita Ram Goel, or rather with his writings, in the late nineteen-eighties. I had gone to Savarkar Sadan, near Shivaji Park in Mumbai, to buy a copy of Nathuram Godse’s ‘May It Please Your Honour’ – ironical since Sita Ram Goel was a staunch admirer of Mahatma Gandhi. [The truth is, over the years, without blinding myself to his many faults, some of which cost the nation dear, and without losing my respect for Godse either , I have also acquired great respect for Mahatma Gandhi, and his life and philosophy, and their great relevance in an increasingly ruthless world. This may be difficult to understand if we think only in terms of black and white.]” HINDUTVA OR HINDU NATIONALISM Hindu Nationalist ideology is generally referred to as Hindutva – a word coined by Veer Savarkar, and later taken up by the Hindu Mahasabha (of which Savarkar himself was twice President) and the RSS. In the last two decades, the word has become a common word in Indian politics, bandied about by the likes of the BJP and the Shiv Sena and by their political opponents. Anybody and everybody interprets the word to his own convenience, but there can be no doubt about its basic meaning: it means an ideology for the defence of Hindu society, culture and civilisation. The following is an attempt to elaborate on the ideology of Hindutva as a complete nationalist ideology from the point of view of three aspects: I. Conventional Hindutva. III. Socio-Economic Nationalism. I. CONVENTIONAL HINDUTVA Conventional Hindutva is what is generally understood by the term Hindutva: an ideology for the defence of Hindu society and civilisation. As the word defence indicates, the first premise is that Hindu society and civilisation are under attack. Societies and civilisations have been under attack from other societies and civilisations since the beginnings of time. It is a natural corollary of the baser side of human nature, and the vicissitudes of Time and Nature have seen the demise of many a society and civilisation. But the Old Testament of the Bible for the first time introduced a new element: the destruction of societies and civilisations as a matter of religious ideology. The birth of Christianity, 2000 years ago, gave a final revolutionary touch by converting this local ideology (restricted only to Palestine, the land “promised” by Jehovah to the Jews) into an international imperialist ideology. A few centuries later, Islam followed suit. The two, between them, laid waste most of the earlier societies and civilisations of Europe, Western and Central Asia, and North Africa. In the mediaeval period, Christian Imperialism took on a new form as European Imperialism, and destroyed the societies and civilisations of North and South America, and Australia, and did much damage (particularly political and psychological) in the rest of Africa and Asia. It was only when a similar ideology (Nazism) arose in a part of Europe itself, which sought to do to the rest of Europe what some parts of Europe had done to most of the rest of the world, that European Imperialism lost its steam. The centre of Christian Imperialism shifted to America. Today American Imperialism dominates the world with (apart from its military and economic clout) its three powerful ideological weapons: Proselytisation, Capitalism and Consumerism. In the process, Christian Imperialism also laid low another rival imperialism, which had raised its head for one century, Marxist Imperialism; and it is now in the process of trying to do the same to its more long-standing rival, Islamic Imperialism. Hindu civilisation is the one civilisation whose inner greatness and resilience enabled it to withstand centuries of Christian and Islamic imperialist attack. It is in fact the last major bastion of the pre-Christian civilisations of the world. For that very reason, Hindu society is today the single major target of all these Imperialisms, which are backed by powerful international forces. As Sita Ram Goel puts it at the very beginning of his “ Hindu Society Under Siege ”: “ the death of Hindu society is no longer an eventuality which cannot be envisaged. This great society is now besieged by the same dark and deadly forces which have overwhelmed and obliterated many earlier societies. Suffering from a loss of élan, it has become a house divided within itself. And its beneficiaries no more seem to be interested in its survival because they have fallen victims to hostile propaganda. They have developed towards it an attitude of utter indifference, if not downright contempt. Let no Hindu worth his salt remain complacent. Hindu society is in mortal danger as never before. ” (p.2) This fact is clear to anyone who looks around with open eyes at what is going on all around, and who is clear-sighted and level headed enough to see, and honest enough to admit, the situation. To illustrate this, let me quote from an article in the Indian Express (Sunday 13/6/2004) by Tavleen Singh , a journalist who cannot by any means be called a Hindu communalist (she points out, in the article, that she is “not a Hindu”), and who was always considered by Sita Ram Goel to be a typical secularist scribe, entitled “ This Inner Voice Too Needs Hearing ”: “… the word Hindutva is being used as a term of abuse … it is used mostly in pejorative terms…the debate appears no longer confined to the cloistered world of priests, or even the self-serving one of politics, it has expanded into a challenge to Hindu civilisation … the wider attack on Indian civilisation that this pejorative use of the word Hindu represents. It bothers me that I went to school and college in this country without any idea of the enormous contribution of Hindu civilisation to the history of the world. It bothers me that even today our children, whether they go to state schools or expensive private ones, come out without any knowledge of their own culture or civilisation … You cannot be proud of a heritage you know nothing about, and in the name of secularism, we have spent 50 years in total denial of the Hindu roots of this civilisation. We have done nothing to change a colonial system of mass education founded on the principle that Indian civilisation had nothing to offer … our contempt for our culture and civilisation … evidence of a country that continues to be colonised to the core? Our contempt for who we are gets picked up these days by the Western press … racism [is] equated with Hindu Nationalism. For countries that gave us slavery and apartheid that really is rich, but who can blame them when we think so badly of ourselves. As for me I would like to state clearly that I believe that the Indic religions have made much less trouble for the world than the Semitic ones and that Hindu civilisation is something I am very proud of. If that is evidence of my being ‘communal’, then, so my inner voice tells me, so be it. ” If Hindu society and civilisation are to be saved from annihilation, there is only one solution: Hindu consciousness must be aroused, a Hindu perspective and world-view must be cultivated, and Hindus must be educated, on the one hand, about Hindu civilisation and its rich heritage and its major contributions to the world in every field, and about the great sages, seers, saints, scholars, scientists, soldiers, artistes and statesmen, the individuals in every field who represent our past glory and heritage; and, on the other, about the forces out to destroy this civilisation, about the textual sources, ideologies, histories, strategies and present activities of these forces, and about the Hindu struggles against these forces and the Hindu heroes involved in these struggles. It is also necessary to alert Hindus to the inner weaknesses which make Hindu society susceptible to these forces, the dangers of Secularism, the self-alienation among the Hindu elites and ruling classes and their indifference to, and contempt for, their own culture and civilisation, the breakdown of the defence mechanism of Hindu society, the perversion of certain Hindu values like tolerance, universalism and humanism, and the abandonment of certain other Hindu values like self-respect, rationalism and capacity for objective analysis. Voice of India books have sought to do just this. Before Voice of India came on the scene, Hindutva discussion hovered around topics and issues which could be broadly subsumed under the headings “appeasement of minorities” and “discrimination against Hindus and Hinduism” in the Indian polity. The discussions were concerned only with the symptoms of the disease rather than with the root causes and the cure. Voice of India changed everything: it identified both the external forces as well as the internal weaknesses, and it offered the only cure: Knowledge of the Truth . The only solution, according to Sita Ram Goel, was for Hindus to know the truth about the forces out to destroy Hindu society. Once Hindus knew the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, these forces would lose their self-righteousness, their self-assurance, and their vigour and potential for damage. Hindu society, on the other hand, would recognise its own potential and would regain the self-confidence to rise up again to take its rightful place among the comity of nations. The only solution is, therefore, to propagate Sita Ram Goel’s writings and Voice of India publications, and the message and facts contained in these writings and publications, on a war-footing. An awakened Hindu society will do the rest. II. CULTURAL NATIONALISM Sita Ram Goel , at the very outset of his “ Hindu Society Under Siege ”, tells us: “ there are many Hindus who are legitimately proud of Hindu art, architecture, sculpture, music, painting, dance, drama, literature, linguistics, lexicography and so on. But they seldom take into account the fact that this great wealth of artistic, literary and scientific heritage will die if Hindu society which created it is no more there to preserve, protect and perpetuate it ” (pp.1-2). In my 1993 book “ The Aryan Invasion Theory And Indian Nationalism ”, I have pointed out in detail how conversion to Islam and Christianity creates a process of cultural de-Indianisation. De-Hinduisation of Indian society, therefore, will inevitably lead to the demise of Indian culture: Hindu society must survive if Indian culture is to survive. But the reverse is also true: Indian culture must survive if Hindu society is to survive. Hindu society would no more be Hindu society if it lost all vestiges of Indian culture or if it allowed Indian culture to die out. And Hindutva without Indian culture as its very basis is a meaningless exercise . Before going further, let me clarify what exactly the words “culture” and “Indian culture” mean in our discussion in this section on Cultural Nationalism: Culture does not refer only to “values”, “ethos” and “way of life”, which are really vague words, which can be made to mean anything. It refers to actual concrete culture. As I put it in the 1997 VOI volume, “ Time for Stock Taking ”, it refers to “ every single aspect of India’s matchlessly priceless heritage: climate and topography; flora and fauna; races and languages; music, dance and drama; arts and handicrafts; culinary arts; games and physical systems; architecture; costumes and apparels; literature and sciences …” (p.227). And Indian culture refers not just to the “ cultural practices springing from Vedic or Sanskritic sources, but from all other Indian sources independently of these: the practices of the Andaman islanders and the (pre-Christian) Nagas are as Hindu in the territorial sense, and Sanatana in the spiritual sense, as classical Sanskritic Hinduism ” (ibid). Indian culture is the greatest and richest in the world. India (ie. the Indian subcontinent) is the only place in the world which is rich in all the fields of culture: natural (topography, climate, flora and fauna), ethnic (races and languages), and civilisational (music, dance and drama; lore and literature; art, sculpture and handicrafts; architecture; costumes, ornaments and beauty culture; cuisine; games and physical systems; religion; philosophy; social and material sciences, etc.). Its greatness lies in both factors: the richness of its range and variety, as well as its contributions to the world, in every single field of culture. To give just a glimpse: in climate, we have the hottest place in the world, Jacobabad (in present-day Pakistan), but also, as per the Encyclopaedia Britannica, we have, outside the Polar regions, “the largest area under permanent ice and snow”. We have dry arid regions in the west, which receive no rainfall at all, and at the same time, the area, around Cherapunji in the east, with the highest rainfall in the world. And we have, in different parts of the land, a wide range of shades of climatic conditions between these extremes. The topography of India, from the most intriguing and diverse mountain system in the world, the Himalayas, in the north, through the plains, plateaus, mountains and valleys of the peninsula down to the Andaman-Nicobar and Lakshadweep island clusters in the south, also seems to leave no topographical feature unrepresented. India’s forests and vegetation also cover every range and variety from the coniferous and deciduous types to the monsoon and tropical types to the desert and scrubland types. And India has been one of the primary contributors to the world in every kind of plant and forest products; to name only some of the most prominent ones: rice, a variety of beans, a wide range of vegetables including eggplants and a number of different types of gourds, fruits like bananas, mangoes and a range of citrous fruits, oilseeds like sesamum, important woods including teak, ebony and sandalwood, spices like black pepper, cardamom, cinnamon, ginger and turmeric, dyes like madder and indigo, important materials like cotton, jute, shellac and India-rubber, a wide range of medicinal herbs, etc., etc. Moreover, being strategically situated between, and sharing in, three different ecological areas, India shares countless other important plants and products with northern and western Asia on the one hand and Southeast Asia on the other. And, as a detailed study will show, it has indigenous equivalents, or potential equivalents, for a wide range of other non-Indian plants and products. India’s fauna is the richest in the world: Robert Wolff , in the introduction to his book, “ Animals of Asia ”, tells us that “ India has more animal species than any other region of equal area in the world. ” But the richness is not only in comparison with regions of equal area. For example, India is the only area in the world which has all seven families of carnivora native to it, while the whole of Africa has five (no bears or procyonids), the whole of North and South America together have five (no hyaenas or viverrids), the whole of Europe has five (no hyaenas or procyonids), and, in Asia, the areas to the east and north have six (no hyaenas) and the areas to the west have six (no procyonids). Within the carnivora family of cats, India is the only area to have all six genera, while the whole of Africa has four (no uncia or neofelis), North and South America together, and Europe, have three (no acinonyx, uncia or neofelis), and, in Asia, the areas to the east and north have five (no acinonyx) and the areas to the west have four (no uncia or neofelis). In respect of snakes, India is the only area in the world to have all twelve of the recognised families, while the whole of Africa has eight, and both North and South America together have nine, and what is significant is that one of the twelve families (Uropeltidae or shield-tailed snakes) is found only in South India and Sri Lanka, so that India alone has twelve families, while the whole rest of the world put together has eleven. Of the three families of crocodilians, two (crocodiles and gavials) are found in India, one of them (gavials) exclusively in India. India is the richest area in the world in the variety of bovine species, second only to Africa in variety of antelope species, and second only to China in variety of deer species. The list is a long one. And India is not only a primary wildlife destination, it is also one of the important centres of domestication of animals, the most important of these being the domestic buffalo, the domesticated elephant, one of the two races of domestic cattle and the commercially most important bird in the world, the domestic fowl. The most ornamental bird in the world, the peacock, is also Indian. There are three recognised races in the world (Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid), and India is the only area in the world which has all three native to it: the Andaman islanders are the only true Negroids outside Africa. Sometimes, a fourth race, Australoid, is postulated (otherwise included among Caucasoids), and we have it among the Veddas of Sri Lanka. Language wise, six of the nineteen families of languages in the world are found in India, three of them (Dravidian, Andamanese and Burushaski) only in India. And the numerically and politically most important family of languages in the world, Indo-European, originated (as I have shown in my books) in India. As a civilisation, Indian civilisation is the oldest continuous civilisation still in existence. As A.L.Basham puts it, in his “ The Wonder That Was India ”: “ The ancient civilisation of India differs from those of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece, in that its traditions have been preserved without a break down to the present day. Until the advent of the archaeologist, the peasant of Egypt or Iraq had no knowledge of the culture of his forefathers, and it is doubtful whether his Greek counterpart had any but the vaguest ideas about the glory of Periclean Athens. In each case there had been an almost complete break with the past. On the other hand…to this day legends known to the humblest Indian recall the names of shadowy chieftains who lived nearly a thousand years before Christ, and the orthodox Brahman in his daily worship repeats hymns composed even earlier. India and China have, in fact, the oldest continuous cultural traditions in the world. ” India has been one of the most important centres of civilisation in the world in practically every age. We need not refer here to Indian traditions of fabled kingdoms going back into the extremely remote past. Even in the perception of the world in general, and scholarly perception at present, India was always a fabled wonderland: in (at least) the third and second millenniums B.C., the Indus-Sarasvati sites represented a relatively egalitarian and peaceful, highly organised, standardised and developed civilisation, with many features unparalleled elsewhere, and covered a far larger area and remained constant and relatively unchanging for a far longer period (nearly a millennium) than any other civilisation. In the first millennium B.C., the Arthashastra depicts an extremely organised civilisation which appears almost modern in many respects, and India was idealised and mythicised by writers from China to Greece. In the first millennium A.D., we had the golden period of Indian civilisation during the reign of the Guptas, at which point of time, according to A.L.Basham, “India was perhaps the happiest and most civilised region of the world”. And in the second millennium A.D., India was the desired land of dreams, in the quest for which half the world had the misfortune to be “discovered” by Europe. And this civilisation has made primary contributions to the world in every single field of civilisational culture. To begin with, religion: India is one of the two centres of origin of the major world religions (the other being West Asia): Buddhism was at one time the dominant religion not only in East and Southeast Asia, but also in Central Asia and parts of West Asia, and it is increasingly being accepted as having been one of the major influencing factors in the initial formative stages of Christianity. Hinduism was the source of many religious trends (asceticism, monasticism, etc., etc.) in the past, and, even today, Hindu-Buddhist philosophies are acquiring an ever increasing following among thinkers and intellectuals all over the world, and Hindu religio-philosophical concepts and terms (guru, nirvana, karma, etc., etc.) are basic components in the international spiritual lexicon. Science and scientific temperament are one of the defining points of a civilised society, and India’s contributions to the development of science in the world have been more fundamental than that of any other civilisation then or since. India, to begin with, invented the zero-based decimal system, without which no significant scientific development and advancement beyond certain rudimentary levels would ever have been possible in human society . This contribution is so very important, and so well illustrates the level of scientific thought-processes in India, that it needs to be elaborated in some detail here: to begin with, the first logical stage in the development of a numeral system in any primitive society would be the very concept of numbers (one, two, three, etc.). The second logical stage would be the representation of these numbers in pictorial form, eg. three pictures or symbolic figures of cows and two of sheep would represent three cows and two sheep. The third logical stage would be the shifting of the concept of numbers from concrete objects to abstract ideas: eg. the use of a simple symbol, usually a vertical line, to represent the number one. Seven vertical lines followed by the picture or symbol of a cow would represent seven cows. As the need for using bigger and bigger numbers arose, attempts would be made to create groups, as in the common method of keeping the score by drawing upto four vertical lines to represent numbers upto four, and then a fifth line vertically across the four to represent a full hand. The fourth logical stage would be the development of a base number; usually ten, on the basis of the number of fingers on the two hands used for counting. Egyptian civilisation was at this stage of development in its numeral system, which invented specific symbols for one, ten, hundred, thousand, ten thousand, etc. So, instead of representing the number 542 with 542 vertical lines, the Egyptians represented it with five repetitions of the symbol for hundred, four of the symbol for ten, and two of the symbol for one. [Incidentally, this still had the drawback of requiring symbols to be repeated as many as nine times; and the Greeks, who borrowed the Egyptian system, went off at a tangent, off the logical track, in their attempt to remedy this. They invented halfway symbols: additional symbols for five, fifty, five hundred, etc. The Romans, who borrowed the Greek system, went even further off the logical track: they tried to avoid even four repetitions by employing a minus principle. Thus, four, nine, forty and ninety were not IIII, VIIII, XXXX and LXXXX, but IV, IX, XL and XC. Going off at another tangent, the Ionian Greeks, the Arabs, the Hebrews, and others, assigned numerical values to the letters of their alphabet, the numbers one to nine represented by the first nine alphabets, the numbers ten to ninety represented by the next nine, and so on, creating a more concise but extremely illogical numeral system of limited utility.] The fifth logical stage would be the avoidance of repetition of the base symbols by means of specific symbols to represent each number of repetitions. Chinese civilisation was at this stage of development in its numeral system, which had base symbols for one, ten, hundred, thousand, ten thousand, etc., as well as symbols for the numbers from two to nine. Thus, the Chinese represented 542 with the symbols for five, hundred, four, ten and two, in that order. The sixth and last logical stage would be a numeral system with a rigid place system and a symbol for zero. Indian civilisation was at this last, and highest, logical stage in its numeral system, with symbols for the numbers from one to nine and a symbol for zero, and a rigid place system, which made it possible to represent any and every number with only ten symbols. [Incidentally, the Mesopotamians and the Mayas of Central America had also hit upon their own versions of zero. But, as they had gone off the logical track in the earlier stages, their systems remained grossly unwieldy and illogical: the Mesopotamian system had an unwieldy base of sixty, but symbols only for one, ten and zero; and even a symbol to incorporate a minus principle, as in the Roman system. And the Maya system had a base of twenty, but symbols only for one, five and zero; and, to accommodate the calendar, the second base was 360 instead of 400]. India’s contribution of the zero based decimal system (and, incidentally, also of most of the basic principles in the different branches of Mathematics) represents a fundamental revolutionary landmark in the history of world science on par with the invention of fire, or the invention of the wheel. But this invention was no accident. The scientific temperament in India was so developed that it was inevitable that such a fundamental development should have taken place only in India. As Alain Danielou puts it (in his “ Introduction to the Study of Musical Scales ”), “ The Hindu theory is not like other systems, limited to experimental data: it does not consider arbitrarily as natural certain modes or certain chords, but it takes as its starting point the general laws common to all the aspects of the world’s creation …” (p.99). Curt Sachs , on the same subject (in his monumental “ The Rise of Music in the Ancient World – East and West ”), refers to the “ naïve belief of historically untrained minds that patterns usual in the person’s own time and country are ‘natural’ …”, and contrasts it with classification in India which “ starts from actual facts, but is thorough in its accomplishment regardless of practice ” (p.171). It was this scientific temperament which led the ancient Indians to go deep into the study of any and every subject, and to produce detailed texts on everything, whether on religious laws, rituals and customs (the vast Vedic literature: Samhitas, Brahmanas, Kalpasutras, Dharmasutras, etc.), philosophy (the Upanishads, and the sutras, commentaries, and other texts of the six Darshanas and the Buddhist, Jain and heterodox philosophies, etc.), linguistics (Panini, Yaska, and numerous Vedic and post-Vedic texts on Grammar, Phonetics, Etymology, etc.), medicine (the Samhitas of Charaka, Sushruta, Vagbhata, etc.), administration and statecraft (Kautilya’s Arthashastra, etc.), the performing arts (Bharata’s Natyashastra, etc.), and every other possible art, craft, technology and science, right down to the art of making love (Vatsyayana’s Kamasutra). No subject was beyond the detailed investigations of the ancient Indians. And basic texts, on any subject, themselves the culminations of long and rich traditions, were followed by detailed commentaries, and by commentaries on the commentaries. And there were well-established and regulated systems and forums all over the country for objective debates on controversial points or subjects. With all this, it is not surprising that Indian civilisation should have been the source of origin of so many things. As an illustration of India’s role on the world stage, take the performing arts (music, dance and drama). A.C.Scott (in his “ The Theatre in Asia ”, p.1), writes: “ It will be seen that stage practice in Asia owes a great deal to India as an ancestral source. Indian influence on dance and theatre which are one and the same in Asia was like some great subterranean river following a spreading course and forming new streams on the way ”. Curt Sachs (in his magnum opus “ the Rise of Music in the Ancient World – East and West ”), tells us that Indian music “ had a decisive part in forming the musical style of the East, of China, Korea and Japan, and … what today is called IndoChina and the Malay Archipelago. There was a westward exportation, too … Indian influence on Islamic music … the system of melodic and rhythmic patterns, characteristic of the Persian, Turkish, and Arabian world, had existed in India as the ragas and talas more than a thousand years before it appeared in the sources of the Mohammedan Orient. ”(p.192). Elsewhere, he goes into more specific details about this fundamental Indian influence on the music and dance of China and Japan (pp.139, 145), Bali (p.139), Siam (p.152), Burma (p.153), and Indonesia (pp. 130-132). Alain Danielou (in his “ Introduction to the Study of Musical scales ”), tells us that the Indian “ theory of musical modes … seems to have been the source from which all systems of modal music originated ” (p.99), and goes so far as to suggest that “ Greek music, like Egyptian music, most probably had its roots in Hindu music ” (pp.159-160). India was the land of origin of a wide range of musical concepts and musical instruments, not only in respect of the musical systems of Asia, but even beyond : as per the “ Guinness Book of Facts and Feats ”, bagpipes (so characteristic of Scottish music), and hourglass drums (the talking drums or message drums of Africa), originated in India. India first recognised the division of the octave into seven notes, twelve semi-tones, and twenty-two microtones (the world has still to progress towards, and Indian music as it is practiced today has even regressed from, the microtones). The present classification of musical instruments into four classes (idiophonic, membranophonic, aerophonic and chordophonic) originated in India. It was not only in respect of music, or of religion and sciences, that Indian influence on Asia, and thereby on the rest of the world, was “like some great subterranean river following a spreading course and forming new streams on the way”. This was the case in practically every field of culture. Indian sculpture and architecture spread eastwards and influenced the development of classical sculpture and architecture in the East and Southeast: the biggest temple complex in the world, the Hindu temple complex of Angkor Vat in Cambodia, is the most eloquent example. Indian lore and literature spread eastwards and westwards, leading to the development of new genres of literature: the traditional lore and literature of Southeast Asia are suffused with the spirit, themes and vocabulary of Sanskrit epic literature, while (apart from the scientific and technical literature on every subject), Indian literary techniques and themes, like animal fables and the tale-within-a-tale technique, among others, spread out westwards, and inspired the writing of classics like the Arabian Nights and the Greek Aesop’s fables. Indian board games, like chess and ludo (pachisi), among others, likewise, spread out east and west, the former becoming the national game of Asia (with local varieties, all of them with local names derived from the Sanskrit chaturang, in every country from Arabia to Korea and Vietnam), before acquiring its present international status. Physical culture of every kind, from systems of physical exercises and martial arts, to comprehensive systems of health like Ayurveda (including, apart from its varieties of oral medicines, also the panchakarma techniques, theories of dietetics, etc.), and Hathayoga (including, besides asanas, a range of breathing techniques, concentration and meditation techniques, a wide range of internal and external cleansing techniques, etc.), also spread east and west, giving rise to similar techniques elsewhere: Greek medicine is acknowledged by many scholars to owe much to Indian medicine, and the renowned martial arts of the East acknowledge their Indian origin. Indian cuisine is generally acknowledged to be one of the great cuisines of the world, and the greatest when it comes to vegetarian cuisine, and is gaining popularity worldwide, but what is significant is that food culture all over the world would have been poor indeed without India’s material contributions to the four tastes: sweet (sugar), sour (lemons, tamarinds, kokam and amchur), pungent (black pepper and ginger), and bitter (bitter gourds), as well as a wide variety of other spices and flavourings. In respect of clothes and ornaments, again, India’s contributions are of primary importance: cotton, the most important fabric in the world, originated in India, along with numerous important techniques, of weaving, dyeing and printing, basic to the textile industry. The use of diamonds originated in India: till the eighteenth century, India was the only source of diamonds, and the ornament and jewellery industry in India was a world pioneer in many ways. Beauty culture, the art of shringara, as described in great detail in the ancient texts, had developed very highly in ancient India, and India was the source of a great many kinds of clothing, ornaments, herbal cosmetics and applications, aromatic oils and beauty techniques. But it is not only on the basis of past glories (although, as a civilisation with the only continuous tradition, the past is not a dead past but is an intrinsic part of our present identity), or contributions to the world (considerable, and even unmatchable, as they are), that Indian culture can be considered the greatest and richest culture in the world. Indian culture is the greatest and richest culture in the world on the strength of its glorious present as well: India is a complete cultural world in itself, both in respect of the fact that it represents every stage of development in culture (from the most sophisticated, right from ancient times, to the most primitive, even in modern times or as late as the twentieth century), as well as in respect of the fact that the richness and variety of its cultural wealth, in every respect, is so great that it need never look beyond its own cultural frontiers for inspiration, innovation and development in any field of culture. To illustrate the first point: in mathematical science, ancient India conceived and analysed the mathematical concepts of zero and infinity, achieved a fundamental revolution by devising a numeral system which can represent any and every conceivable number with only ten symbols, and coined names for numbers of incredibly high denominations (a Buddhist work, Lalitavistara , gives the names for base-numbers up to 10 raised to 421, ie., one followed by 421 zeroes). And, at the same time, we have the Andamanese languages, which have not developed the concept of numbers beyond two: they have names only for “one” and “two”, which is in effect “one” and “more than one”, which is no numeral system at all, and represents the absolutely most primitive stage in any language in the world. Likewise, in music, our Indian classical music has, since thousands of years, developed a detailed theory of music, and used the richest range of notes (twenty-two microtones as compared to the twelve notes of western classical music), scales (every possible combination of the basic notes), modes and rhythms (the most unimaginably wide range of melodies and rhythms, from the simplest to the most complicated and intricate, with, for example, rhythms having even 11, 13, 17, 19, etc. beats per cycle, unimaginable outside India), and musical instruments (with the most intricate playing techniques in the world). And, at the same time, the absolutely most primitive form of music in the world is found among the Veddas of Sri Lanka: they possess the most primitive form of singing in the world, and, along with certain remote Patagonian tribes, are the only people in the world who “ not only do not possess any musical instrument, but do not even clap their hands or stamp the ground ”( Curt Sachs , “ The History of Musical Instruments ”, p.26). This is the case in almost every field of culture: on the one hand, India has the richest traditional cuisine in the world, one of the most highly developed traditions of architecture in all its aspects, and an incredibly wide range of costumes and ornaments, all of hoary antiquity, and, on the other hand, we have tribes who are hunter-gatherers and subsist only on wild berries, who live in caves, or who live almost in the nude. And a glance at two representative fields of civilisational culture, religion and music, will suffice to make the second point clear: The range of Indian religion, both in respect of philosophy and doctrines, as well as customs and rituals, is quite a complete one: every shade of thought and idea (theistic, atheistic and agnostic), from the most materialistic to the most spiritual, from the most rationalistic to the most irrational, from the most humane to the most barbaric, and from the most puritanical or orthodox to the most profane or heterodox, has been explored by the different schools of philosophy, different sects and different individual writers; and every kind and level of ritual and custom from the most primitive to the most sophisticated, from the simplest to the most elaborate, and from the most humane to the most ruthless, is found in one or the other part of India. The only common thread is the complete absence of intolerant imperialistic tendencies: if such ever arose in the history of Hinduism, they died out just as quickly. Therefore, also, Hindu India, before the rise of modern liberalism in the west, was the only safe haven in the civilised world for the followers of religions and sects persecuted elsewhere: Jews, Zoroastrians, Syrian Christians…in modern times, Bahais and Ahmadiyas. (That this proved costly in the long run, because of the failure to distinguish between religions and imperialist ideologies, is a different matter). Curt Sachs (“ The Rise Of Music in the Ancient World – East and West ”, p.157) writes: “ The roots of music are more exposed in India than anywhere else. The Vedda in Ceylon possess the earliest stage of singing that we know, and the subsequent strata of primitive music are represented by the numberless tribes that in valleys and jungles took shelter from the raids of northern invaders. So far as this primitive music is concerned, the records are complete or at least could easily be completed if special attention were paid to the music of the ‘tribes’ … hundreds of tribal styles …”. Then there is the folk music, the range and variety of which is mind-boggling: every single part of India is rich in its own individual range of styles of folk music, and the folk music of even any one state of India (say Maharashtra, Rajasthan or Karnataka, for example, or even Sind, Baluchistan, Sri Lanka or Bhutan for that matter) would merit a lifetime of study. And, right on top, we have the great tradition of Indian classical music, which we have already referred to. Although the oldest living form of classical music in the world, and although it has evolved and developed over the centuries, losing and gaining in the process, Curt Sachs points out that “ there is no reason to believe that India’s ancient music differed essentially from her modern music ” (p.157 above). Many western musicologists (Alain Danielou, M.E. Cousins, Donald Lentz, etc.) have spoken about the superiority of Indian classical music over western classical music, but it is at least certain that Indian Classical music is one of the two most classical forms in the world. Apart from the classical music, we have the other great tradition, of Vedic chanting and singing in its many varieties, best preserved in South India, and different varieties of Sanskrit songs, preserved in temples and maths all over India. And in all the varieties of music (classical, folk, popular and tribal), we have the most unparalleled range of musical instruments in the world, unique in their range from the most primitive and simple to the most sophisticated and complicated in respect of techniques of making, artistic appearance, techniques of playing, and qualities of sound, in every type: idiophonic, membranophonic, aerophonic and chordophonic; monophonic, pressurephonic, polyphonic and multiphonic. All this music and all these musical instruments were preserved down the ages by temple traditions, courts, courtesans, great masters and professional castes, musical institutions, and tribal, caste and community traditions. The twentieth century saw a consolidation of all this rich musical wealth due, on the one hand, to the invention of recording devices, and, on the other, to the enthusiasm natural in a modern India in the atmosphere of an independence movement. New generations of musicians and scholars, and government bodies like Films Division, Akashwani and Doordarshan, did a herculean job in studying, recording and popularising all forms of Indian music. New trends in classical music (eg. the gharana system, new semi-classical forms, including Marathi natya sangeet, etc.), new innovations (eg. the “Vadyavrind” orchestration of Indian melodic music, etc.), and new genres of popular music (eg. new forms of devotional music, of popular music like the bhavgeet genre in Marathi music, and Film music) added to India’s incomparable musical wealth. This was about music. The same is the case in respect of India’s cultural wealth in every other field. The same sources: ancient texts, temple traditions, courts, courtesans, great masters and professional castes, institutions, and tribal, caste and community traditions, have combined to preserve lore and literature, dance forms, arts and crafts, architectural forms, cuisine, games and physical systems, etc. etc., and a detailed study will show that Indian culture is among the greatest and richest in the world in any and every individual field of culture, and the greatest and richest in the world in the sum total of culture. But today, this greatest and richest culture in the world, which survived all kinds of challenges in the past, is being slowly and systematically wiped out or turned into a caricature of itself. And, if systematic steps are not taken soon on a war footing, it will soon be a faint and fading memory of the past. And not only will that be the end of Hindu society as we know it, but it will be a great tragedy for world culture as well. It is necessary first to identify the forces and factors responsible for this. Tavleen Singh, for example, in her article already referred to, writes: “ when I go to the Vishwanath Mandir in Benares and listen to the most powerful, magical aarti I hear from the priests that the knowledge of it will probably die because the temple is now controlled by secular bureaucrats ”. To begin with, secularism is clearly one of the factors responsible for the gross indifference within Hindu society towards its cultural heritage. But secularism, in this context, can be of three kinds: one, the goody-goody secularism of Mahatma Gandhi, which was based on an extreme and distorted understanding of certain intrinsic values in Hinduism, and which, although it succeeded in blinding Hindu society to the true nature of its enemies by whitewashing them liberally, and thereby weakened Hindu resistance, was nevertheless based on a deep pride in, and respect for, Hinduism and its culture. Two, the arrogant secularism of Jawaharlal Nehru, based on his westernised upbringing and perspectives, which combined the colonial white man’s contempt for Hindus and Hinduism with the colonial white man’s grudging admiration for some aspects of Indian culture. And, three, the secularism of leftist intellectuals, based on a rabid and pathological hatred for Hinduism and Hindu civilisation. This third kind of secularism has gradually come to acquire a monopoly over the term, and today it dictates the definitions and the contours of what is, and what is not, secular. Many writers, myself included, therefore, generally club extremist secularists of this kind as leftists, whether or not the term would be applicable to them in respect of economic beliefs. It is this secularism which froths at the mouth at the very idea that the Aryans could be natives of India, or that Indian civilisation is basically Hindu civilisation and that this civilisation contributed greatly to world civilisation, or that the Ramayana and Mahabharata are national epics which should be made familiar to all Indians (ie. to the younger generations), or that the Gupta period was a golden period in Indian history, or that Vande Mataram is a patriotic song, or that Savarkar was a great freedom fighter who deserves due respect, etc., etc.; and which is intrinsically committed to defend and support any, simply any , ideas derogatory to, or ideologies or forces inimical to, Hinduism or Hindu civilisation. It is this secularism which has acquired such a deadly stranglehold over the education system and the media that it has already produced several generations of a Hindu society which is largely ignorant of, indifferent to, and lacking in a sense of pride in, and attachment to, the Hindu roots of its culture and civilisation and the greatness of Indian culture – a society which is, therefore, very susceptible to forces out to destroy this culture. The very lethal role played by this peculiarly Indian brand of secularism in the Indian body politic, very like the role played by viruses in the human body or by computer viruses in computers, has to be recognised as a fundamental factor in rendering Hindu society, civilisation and culture weak and defenceless against its enemies. But, at the same time, while this secularism is undoubtedly inimical to Hindu society and civilisation, it will be misleading to conclude that secularism is also inimical to Indian culture as defined in this section , and to rest satisfied with this conclusion: Secular governments, from day one, have done a great deal for Indian culture by establishing institutions and awards, and organising periodic festivals and other activities, to promote different aspects of Indian culture. A survey of eminent people active in different fields of culture – whether actual participants like dancers, musicians, etc.; or scholars engaged in studying, recording and filming different aspects of culture; or activists fighting to preserve our environment, wildlife, forests, cuisine, dances, musical styles and musical instruments, art forms, handicrafts, architectural styles and monuments, old manuscripts, etc.; or even lay people who appreciate or support all such activities – will show a very fair representation, perhaps even a preponderance, of secularist people. It is, perhaps, just such people that Sita Ram Goel, quoted at the very beginning of this section, has in mind when he talks about Hindus who are legitimately proud of different aspects of Indian culture, but who fail to realise that all this culture “will die if Hindu society which created it is no more there to preserve, protect and perpetuate it”. In some fields, indeed, it is not just vaguely secularist people, but even outright leftists, who are active in the task of preserving aspects of Indian culture, particularly when it comes to aspects of tribal, folk or regional culture. This may be simply because much of their support base comes from the more marginalised, or less westernised, strata of society, or it may be because they see it as an ideological strategy to promote the “Lesser Traditions” of Indian culture, perceived to be in opposition , or at least intended to be propped up as such, to the “Greater Tradition” of Vedic or Classical Hindu civilisation, which is perceived to be promoted by the elite classes, or upper castes, or by Hindutva organisations. Similarly, we find outright leftists engaged in fighting issues of environment, wildlife conservation and deforestation. This, again, may be merely because of the issues of socio-economic ideology involved. But, whatever the reasons, the fact is that they are doing their bit for Indian culture. We find leftists even in the fields of classical music and dance, and in the arts. That the leftist version of secularism is bitter, rabid and vicious in its hatred of Hinduism and everything connected with it is undeniable, but even, for example, in the notorious TV serial “Tamas”, which exemplifies these traits so well (I wrote an unpublished article detailing the many ways in which every scene in the serial exudes ugly anti-Hinduism and false leftist propaganda), we find soul-stirring music and songs steeped in authentic traditions of Indian music – to be contrasted, for example, with the pedestrian, pop varieties of Indian music we find in serials like Ramanand Sagar’s “Ramayana”, so dear to the hearts of Hindutva organisations. Of course, let us not get carried away by the above facts: rabid hatred for Hinduism and Hindu civilisation is certainly not a factor likely to foster a love for Indian culture or a desire to preserve, protect and perpetuate it. And, there is no dearth of doyens of secularist practice who throw secular tantrums over even such perfectly innocuous Indian cultural acts such as lighting a lamp, or waving an aarti, to inaugurate a function. Moreover, the leftist concern for tribal or folk cultures, referred to above, does not, for example, prevent most of them from giving their unstinting support to the activities of the greatest enemies of these cultures, the Christian missionaries. Indian leftist secularism is an extremely sick and perverted ideology, which ever takes on newer and more sick and perverted forms, and the rule is that the sickest and most perverted form sets the standard. As rabid, and unreasonable, hatred knows no limits, it would be premature to presume limits to the depths to which secularism could sink, or to give any certificates to it. Nevertheless, all said and done, if the greatest and richest culture in the world is in real and active danger of being set on the downward path towards extinction, it would be futile to be satisfied with merely laying the blame at the doors of secularism. In the particular case quoted by Tavleen Singh, for example, if the powerful aarti at the Vishwanath temple is in danger of dying out, it is not so much because the temple is controlled by “ secular bureaucrats” – just “corrupt bureaucrats”, “indifferent bureaucrats”, or even simply “bureaucrats” would suffice. In fact, with due respect to Tavleen Singh (whose thought-provoking articles have often inspired me with respect, even when I have sharply differed with many of them, since it is obvious that Tavleen Singh is at least genuine and true to herself in whatever she writes), it is not secularism (though secularism very definitely prepares the ground for it) which is responsible for the aarti at the Vishwanath temple, and literally millions of other cultural treasures, dying out. The true culprits are the very forces which Tavleen Singh supports in her articles (the article quoted by us profusely here is part of a series of articles in defence of the BJP government and its economic policies): the forces of American “globalisation”. Ancient India classified all worldly priorities or activities into three categories: Dharma, Artha and Kama (a fourth category, Moksha, referred to an other-worldly priority). Kama, enjoyment of pleasures of all kinds (physical, mental, physiological, psychological and social) was the first priority of mankind; Artha, production and acquisition of wealth and possessions of all kinds, was a second priority necessary for the fulfillment of the first; and Dharma, Duty (towards any and every conceivable entity) or Righteousness (not in the sense of a holier-than-thou attitude, as the word is generally used, but in the original sense of doing what is right), was the guiding principle above both, regulating the production and acquisition of wealth and the enjoyment of pleasures, besides setting the standards for all other actions. American Imperialism, or “globalisation”, has its three arms, corresponding to the three priorities (rather like the situation in many mythologies where there is an evil counterpart corresponding to every good entity), Proselytisation corresponding to Dharma, Capitalism corresponding to Artha, and Consumerism corresponding to Kama. It is these three arms of American Imperialism (backed by America’s economic and military clout) which are responsible for India’s cultural crisis. Now Dharma, Duty or Righteousness, does not mean religion, which refers to a belief system. In that sense, Hinduism is not a religion, but a veritable Parliament of religions or belief systems. We have already described the range and variety of belief systems which are included in the Hindu ethos: there is simply no single belief, ritual or custom, which can be cited as constituting the common factor between all Hindu groups, the absence of which places any group outside the Hindu pale. [Some people try to postulate caste as such a common factor, also because this serves to divide some particular offshoots of Hinduism from the rest; but this fails to explain many things; for example, whether large sections of Christians in the South, who still function, after decades or even centuries of conversion, as brahmin Christians, dalit Christians etc., are to be treated as Hindus who have never converted to Christianity, or as Christians.] This raises two questions: how, in the absence of a common factor, do we decide that some particular religion is outside the Hindu pale? And what, in the context of our discussion here, do religious conversions have to do with dharma? Actually there is a common factor in that all Hindu groups follow belief systems originating in India . The Indian constitution, also, recognises this as the distinguishing point when it puts only those Indians outside the definition of Hindu, who follow religions which originated outside India. [There is a further distinction among the Indians who follow religions originating outside India, not mentioned in the constitution: these Indians include both non-Hindus (eg. Jews and Zoroastrians, who were never Hindus; whose ancestors were non-Indians who sought refuge in, or migrated to, India in the past) and ex-Hindus (eg. Muslims and Christians, who were originally Hindus; whose ancestors were converted to Islam and Christianity in the past).] And religious conversions have everything to do with Dharma: whatever the meaning of the word in other contexts, it means religion when used in phrases like Hindu dharma (“Hindu religion”) and dharma parivartan (“religious conversion”). Moreover, even in the regular sense of Duty or Righteousness, a conversion from any Indian religion to Islam or Christianity represents a change in Dharma, since in every case it represents a change to the world-view of an intolerant, imperialist religion, and amounts to abandonment of basic concepts of Duty (towards ancestral traditions, religion and culture, etc.). Conversion to Islam or Christianity inevitably leads to a process of total cultural de-Indianisation, which I have described in detail in my book “ The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism ” (p.29-31), and I will only repeat the conclusion here: this cultural de-Indianisation “ is not only in respect of names, languages and scripts, music, dance, and architectural styles, but even in respect of aesthetic and philosophical concepts, and social manners and styles (from styles of greeting to styles of eating). It must be remembered that ultimately every religion is rooted in the cultural and environmental ethos of its land of origin. If Hinduism uses rice, coconuts, bananas and plantain leaves, arecanuts, tulsileaves, turmeric, etc. as the materials for its religious rituals, these are all Indian materials …. This same rule applies to the entire range of customs and rituals …”. Muslim Proselytisation on any significant scale is a thing of the past (despite some much publicised incidents like Meenakshipuram, since Arab money alone, in the absence of other necessary factors, cannot bring about mass conversions; and conversions, if any, of stray individuals to Islam are, like the conversion of any stray individual to any belief system, a matter of personal conviction, not to be confused with organised Proselytisation), but Christian Proselytisation, backed by unlimited media power and finances from America, is going on at a more furious pace than ever: large scale conversions are going on all over the country, not only in new tribal areas like Arunachal Pradesh (till now the only non-Christian tribal bastion in the North-east, Christians have multiplied from less than 0.5% in 1961 to nearly 19% in 2001, not including crypto-Christians , and the figure is rising steadily), but in vulnerable rural and urban poor areas throughout the country, particularly in Orissa and in the South, and even in Kashmir : the Indian Express , 6/4/2003, carries a detailed news report about the large-scale conversions of Muslim youths to Christianity by American evangelists in Kashmir. It is clear that Christian Proselytisation is not just as sinister a threat as ever, but a very much more sinister threat than it ever was before. Now, most Muslim communities in India are communities which converted centuries ago. The same is the case with Christian communities in certain, particularly coastal, areas. Their culture (de-Indianised or otherwise) is , therefore, in many ways, an intrinsic part of our modern Indian ethos, and these communities are an intrinsic part of Indian society. But the same very definitely cannot be said about the neo-convert Christian communities, springing up all over the country, who deserve absolutely no quarters. Proselytisation in this day and age is totally unacceptable and unforgivable, and deserves to be fought with the same ruthlessness with which it functions: absolutely nothing is unfair in the war against Proselytisation . And it is for the traditional Muslim and Christian communities in India to decide whether they want to reciprocate the Hindu attitude of live and let live, or whether they want to identify themselves with, and support, the Imperialist forces of Proselytisation in their offensive against Hinduism. In this context, the report in the Indian Express , referred to above, mentions certain significant facts worth noting: more than 12,000 Muslims have been converted to Christianity recently, and the report tells us: “ Though conversions have not encountered any resistance from Muslim organisations, it has led to tensions between Kashmir’s native Christians – a miniscule community of 650 – and the enthusiastic evangelists. The native Christians are increasingly getting vocal against the outsiders. ‘This type of conversions aren’t good for local Christians who have shared a cordial relationship with Muslims here for centuries…’, says Pastor Leslie Richards, a native protestant living in Braen, Srinagar …”. This raises certain questions: first, when Kashmir is supposed to be in the throes of Islamic terrorist activities, and yet there is no reaction, from either Muslim organisations or the Islamic terrorists, to the large-scale conversion of Muslims to Christianity, what does it say about the Islamic nature of the terrorists, their real target, and the identity of the real bosses who control, and finance, both the missionaries and the terrorists? Second, when will Christian communities and organisations in the rest of the country learn to emulate the reactions and attitude of the native Kashmiri Christians? And, third, when will Hindus learn, from the above situation, to appreciate the sinister threat posed by Proselytisation in this country, and the need for Hindus to cultivate an image of themselves which will motivate these communities and organisations to do so? Conversion is one of the main destroyers of native culture: it automatically cuts off sections of Indians from their cultural roots, and, in the case of Christianity (and Islam), there are specific ideological doctrines which demonise the cultural ethos of the converts’ former state, and require that they be systematically abandoned or drastically modified. But all this applies only to the converts, not to Indian society in general. The other two ideological arms of American Imperialism, however, strike at the whole of Indian society. Ancient India recognised Artha (pursuit of wealth) and Kama (pursuit of pleasures) as two of the three priorities in life, but only when regulated by the third priority: Dharma . The American ideologies of Capitalism and Consumerism, however, represent the unbridled pursuit of wealth and pleasure respectively. Dharma, by any definition is passé: neither morals, principles or ethics, nor sentiment, respect for ancestral traditions, consideration for contemporary mankind in general, or concern for the heritage of the future, has any value whatsoever: all are “outdated” concepts which cannot be allowed to stand as obstacles in the path of the acquisition of wealth or the enjoyment of pleasures. Capitalism, or the ideology of the unbridled pursuit of wealth, is destroying culture on an unbridled scale, on three fronts: at the level of cultural activity, at the level of actual commercial activity, and at the level of Authority. At the level of cultural activity, to begin with, countless cultural activities, seen to be non-lucrative or less lucrative, are being abandoned all over the country. Others are being severely compromised in order to keep, or make, them lucrative: compromise in materials or techniques used, shoddiness in workmanship or performance, short-cut methods, etc., which are resulting in loss of natural spontaneity, cultural authenticity, technological expertise and performance satisfaction, which, in turn, gradually leads to the degeneration and further abandonment of cultural activities. All this is affecting various fields of culture: musical forms and styles, musical instruments, dance forms, architectural styles, art forms, handicrafts, traditional crops, culinary items, etc. At the level of actual commercial activity – businessmen, industrialists, traders, etc. at all scales and levels – the destruction of culture for profit is more to be expected: large-scale exploitation and destruction of forests; large-scale driving of India’s faunal species to extinction by the destruction of their natural habitats as well as by poaching and killing for commercial gain; pollution of rivers, environment, etc.; destruction of beaches for sand quarrying and mountain systems for stone quarrying; destruction of architecturally important heritage structures, sites and areas for commercial construction, etc. But it is at the level of Authority (ie. the elected representatives of the people from local to national level, the bureaucrats from top to bottom, the police, the judiciary, etc.), where major decisions, and action, can be taken both for the preservation and development of culture as well as for the prevention of its destruction, that the evils of capitalism – or Money as God – have taken on the most destructive forms. Today, if big business, industrialists and traders, can lay the country to waste for profit, it is because those in authority, at every single level, have become completely purchasable. For the appropriate price, not only are blatantly destructive illegal activities winked at, but laws are even changed to accommodate these activities: reserved forest areas are dereserved, restrictions on construction activities in specific areas (coastal areas, wooded areas, ecologically sensitive areas, urban areas reserved for cultural activities, urban heritage areas, etc.) are officially withdrawn, and so on. In fact, governments also function as big business, in the name of Development, or in the name of increasing `government revenues, by way of big hydro-electric or other projects (like the Tehri and Narmada projects at the moment, or the much publicised, and fortunately aborted, Silent Valley project in Kerala in the past) or outright commercial activities (like Mayavati’s aborted Taj Corridor project, or the Mufti government’s amusement park project in Pahalgam), and India’s flora, fauna, ecological and environmental ethos, and architectural heritage, continue to be wiped out with (as the Times of India report, 10/10/2003, on the amusement park in Pahalgam, puts it) “Terminator-like efficiency”. Moreover, those in authority have always been responsible for the protection and preservation of culture: this was the role played by kings and rulers in ancient India, who patronised and encouraged cultural activities of all kinds. Even after the advent of Islam, and all that it entailed in matters of the ruthless destruction of infidel cultures, many Muslim rulers, including most of the Mughals, did a great deal in preserving and perpetuating many aspects of Indian culture, for which they often received the flak of Islamic theologians. In many cases, in fact, they developed such a deep respect and attachment for some aspects, that they even tried to appropriate credit for them: in respect of Indian music, for example, Alain Danielou (“ The Ragas of North Indian Music ”, p.5) points out that “ Amir Khusrau (AD 1253-1319) … wrote that Indian music was so difficult and so refined that no foreigner could totally master it even after twenty years of practice ”; and the Muslim attachment to Indian music grew to such an extent that it led to the invention of stories about “ how the various styles of Northern Indian music were developed by musicians of the Mohammedan period … Under Moslem rule, age-old stories were retold as if they had happened at the court of Akbar … Such transfer of legends is frequent everywhere. We … find ancient musical forms and musical instruments being given Persian-sounding names and starting a new career as the innovations of the Moghul court ”. The sum of it is that many Muslim rulers also contributed in the preservation and perpetuation, and even the enriching, of many aspects of Indian culture. The British rule in India, which did introduce many negative factors (such as a system of education, which, in the words of A.C.Scott in “ The Theatre in Asia ”, p.51, led to “ the rise of a class of young prigs for whom it became the done thing to denigrate everything Indian in an attempt at blind imitation of the customs and attitudes of western people ”, whose effects on Indian society have only deepened and multiplied with the passage of time), also consciously did a great deal in preserving arts and crafts, monuments, old manuscripts, etc., and encouraging scholars engaged in the detailed study and meticulous recording of different aspects of Indian culture. Official British records, and the works of western scholars from the colonial period, are even today an incredible source of information in diverse fields. The dawning of independence from British rule in 1947, and the accession to power of “secular” rulers eager to demonstrate their distance from anything “communal” (ie. Hindu) did not change the picture very greatly, since many of these rulers did have some pride in Indian culture, or at least those aspects of Indian culture which were perceived as not likely to attract the “communal” label, and consequently did quite a bit for those aspects of Indian culture, eg. they established institutions and academies for the study, recording, preservation and popularisation of those aspects, instituted awards to honour eminent people and scholars in different fields, organised festivals, etc., to encourage and popularise those aspects, etc. That many of these facilities became the preserve of leftists, and became hotbeds of politics rather than of cultural activity, is a different matter; but institutions such as Akashwani, Doordarshan and Films Division did a truly wonderful, Herculean job in recording and popularising India’s immeasurable wealth of music, dance, etc. However, the concept of Money as God has now changed all this: for perhaps the first time in India’s long history , there is now no real official support for Indian culture . In the last decade or so, perhaps coinciding with the advocacy and adoption of new policies of economic “reforms”, it is now passé for governments to do anything concrete to protect, preserve, record or perpetuate India’s traditional culture, or even to aid and encourage individuals or organisations doing so. Institutions established in the post- Independence era are being literally starved for funds, or funds are being used for any purpose but to achieve the original aims and objectives, or, simply, the very aims and objectives of these institutions are being changed; in any case no new activities, except occasional pedestrian “cultural” projects of a political nature, are being undertaken: the institutions are being slowly transformed from cultural to commercial institutions, in line with the “changing times”. What is infinitely worse is what is happening to the detailed records of the research, documentation and collection undertaken by these institutions, in the not so distant past, to preserve, popularise and perpetuate different aspects of Indian culture: these archival records – print, tape, or film; or actual physical objects – are suddenly becoming an eyesore or an embarrassment, or simply a financial burden, to a cash-conscious leadership with a “reformist” eye on the “globe”. A standard sequence now is as follows: state-funded museums, libraries and archives – or at least the records in them – slowly become rare or inaccessible, in different ways, to the (lay or scholarly) public eye; often “constraints of space” force the authorities to remove these records from their protected environments and dump them in ill-maintained godowns, to rot and decay, unseen and forgotten; and, occasionally, mysterious fires break out in the places which house these archives, destroying invaluable and irreplaceable records (including those pertaining to the golden age of Indian movies), then to be forgotten forever – all these events, incidentally, make available valuable land and funds for more lucrative commercial purposes. The persons in authority are too busy saving, or making, money – for themselves, or, if they are to be believed, for the public coffers – to care. Capitalism, or the ideology of the unbridled pursuit of wealth, would be only half as effective in destroying Indian culture down to its roots, without its sister ideology, Consumerism, or the ideology of the unbridled pursuit of pleasure: Consumerism is, in a sense, an anti-ideological ideology. The very essence of this ideology is that ideologies, principles, morals, ethics, sentiments, etc. don’t matter: pleasure is the only thing that matters. But pleasure can mean many things. The Bhagawad Gita classifies most things into three basic categories: satvik, rajasik and tamasik. Satvik pleasure is the pleasure a person gets by doing good things which give pleasure to, or relieve the pain of, other people, or which are for the general betterment of the world. Rajasik pleasure is the pleasure a person gets by doing things, good or bad, which give him pleasure or relieve his pain, without reference to its effect on other people or on the world in general. And tamasik pleasure is the pleasure a person gets by doing bad things which give pain to, or destroy the pleasure of, other people, or which are to the general detriment of the world. Here, at the moment, we are concerned with the effects of the pursuit of pleasure on culture. There appears to be no particular way in which the pursuit of satvik pleasure can pose a threat to Indian culture. The pursuit of tamasik pleasure can pose a threat to anything and everything: in respect of culture, it takes the form of vandalism, of any kind or description, of monuments, heritage sites, the environment, manuscripts or other records, etc., or deliberate sabotage of cultural activities, or of attempts to protect those cultural activities, purely for the perverted pleasure it gives. This is clearly perverted or criminal activity, and has little to do directly with the ideology of Consumerism. Consumerism is the unbridled pursuit of rajasic pleasure. The ideology closest to it, in the annals of Indian history, is the philosophy or ideology of Charvaka, the ancient Indian sage, whose philosophy can be summed up in his principle rinam kritva ghritam pibeta , “borrow money and drink ghee” (somewhat similar in sense to the English saying, “eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow you die”), and who believed that the main purpose in life should be to maximise pleasure and minimise pain (a view shared by the mainstream philosophies, as well, which considered Kama to be one of the main priorities in life), without the constraints of Dharma (which were required by the other philosophies). He rejected the idea of any afterlife, heaven and hell, or rebirth, and held that existence began and ended with this one single life on earth. [Of course, it is possible to reject the idea of any kind of afterlife, and yet to believe in the need for some kind of constraints, if for no other reason than for the smooth working of the material world]. Consumerism is even more of an opium of the people than religion. And it is much more powerful than Charvaka’s philosophy could ever have been, since it is being propagated by media, more immensely powerful than anyone could ever possibly have imagined in the past, which can enter right into the homes of people in the most remote corner of the world (shades of Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-four”), and dazzle them with visions of pleasures to be enjoyed in the form of sensual entertainment and material possessions of every possible kind. The brainwashing potential of this psychological bombardment is total: today, increasing numbers of Indians, in their millions, are becoming so increasingly obsessed with the pursuit of – and addicted to the unceasing enjoyment of – forms of sensual entertainment and material possessions which (their minds have been conditioned to believe) provide pleasure, that they are as likely to have the time, energy and inclination to bother about what is going on all around them, as a drug-addict would. Consumerism, in the first instance , is therefore a powerful tool of Capitalism in the destruction of culture: while money can only buy outward allegiance, psychological brainwashing can sap resistance and demotivate opposition more fundamentally and effectively. But, Consumerism is not merely a neutraliser of resistance and opposition to the Capitalist destruction of culture. As an arm of American Imperialism, Consumerism in its own right is as powerful as, or perhaps even more powerful than, Capitalism, as a destroyer of culture: the forms of entertainment to which Indians, from the most tender and impressionable age, are becoming addicted, and the material possessions which are becoming objects of obsession, are not just characterised by their sensual and material nature or their ability to obsess, they are characterised by the fact that they represent American culture and ideas of culture. Today, American music and dance; American clothes, styles and fashions; American food and food culture; American lifestyles and work-culture; American ideas of art, humour, morals, etiquette and entertainment; and all things American (or Indian clones of all these aspects of American culture, or Americanised caricatures of aspects of Indian culture), are being marketed, or brainwashed into the brains of Indians, all over India – and not just among elite sections of urban society, as in the past, but among all classes of people in every remote corner of India, due to the ever-increasing reach of the all-pervasive media. [American culture here means western in general, but American in particular; and includes anything and everything, whatever its origin, which is accepted as an approved part of American culture, or becomes the fashion there: whether African musical instruments and styles; Chinese, Mexican or Lebanese cuisine; or Spanish pop songs. Even Indian personalities, ideas or things become respectable when they acquire the stamp of approval of America: as Tavleen Singh puts it in her oft-quoted article, “Young Indians have taken to yoga because it has come back to us from the West and because Madonna swears by it.”] The lethal effects of this brain-washing are evident everywhere. To take the popular and influential field of Indian film music: films in Hindi, as well as in regional languages, at least till the late sixties (though very rarely after that), produced great and immortal music directors, singers, and poets, who did great work in tapping all kinds of musical sources to produce a beautiful and vibrant new genre of Indian music. However, there has literally been a Dr.-Jekyll-to-Mr.Hyde transformation in this field. Now, not only are poetry and melody a thing of the past, and vulgarity, hype and noise the order of the day, but there is a determined trend of westernisation in every respect: western tunes are lifted or copied almost note for note; western, and electronic, musical instruments have almost edged out the Indian instruments from the race; western forms and styles of music, and methods of voice production, dominate the landscape; and natural voices (and even the falsettos which had become the bane of Indian film, and light, music in earlier decades) are being replaced by voices with artificially cultivated, blatantly western accents . And even classic songs from the Golden Age of Indian Film Music are not spared: “remix albums” present versions of old hits, so grossly westernised and vulgarised as to be blasphemous. And it is not just film music (or similar modern genres of popular music like the bhavgeet genre in Marathi music): today, the westernising trend is evident everywhere. The literally thousands of varieties of traditional ensembles of musical instruments, all over India, used for accompanying processions and to grace festive occasions, are rapidly becoming a thing of the past, replaced by western or electronic bands. The traditional dandiya-ras programs, with which the whole of Gujarat, and Gujarati-present areas all over India, reverberated during the Navratri festival, are being replaced everywhere by “disco-dandiya” programs; and the Bhangra of the Punjab is giving way to “Bhangra-rap”. Vande Mataram is known, not in the solemn Akashwani version, or the stirring version in the old Hindi film Anand Math, but in the ghastly, westernised version composed by AR Rahman; and we find similar ghastly westernised versions of many other national or regional patriotic songs, and even of bhajans and devotional songs (especially among elitist classes, and among the followers of the many young, westernised, modern swamis and babas mushrooming everywhere). The list is a long one. Today, an ever-increasing number of Indian children are becoming more familiar with the latest western, or Indian “remix”, hit or “album”, than with their own traditional music and dance: a glance into any house, almost anywhere in the country, will very likely show the smallest child avidly watching, and imitating, the gyrations, gestures and expressions of the performers in some “remix number” or the other. The effect is depressing: to narrate a personal experience, my sister is a teacher in an English medium school in South Mumbai managed by a Gujarati trust, and with a predominance of Gujarati students. When she joined the school around eleven years ago, she was fascinated by the way in which even the smallest Gujarati children were capable of performing the most complicated and intricate group dandiya-ras performances, almost like professionals, as a matter of course and at the shortest notice. Rejoining the school again after a gap of a few years recently, she finds a sea change in the present stock of Gujarati students, who seem as unfamiliar with the art as any normal group of non-Gujarati students anywhere else. And it is not just music and dance: an ever-increasing number of children and youth, all over the country, are becoming more familiar with the different aspects of American, or western, culture, than with those of the traditional culture of India, or even of their own particular communities: pizzas, Chinese food, tacos and McDonald’s burgers; the latest American slang, the latest western mannerisms and expressions, styles of eating and greeting, and of expressing emotions and sentiments (“yessss” with clenched fist upraised, special “days” of the year for different categories of loved ones, bouquets and cards for every occasion, etc.); the latest western clothing, fashions and styles; the latest Barbie-dolls and western toys; the latest western trends in cars, films, TV serials, cartoons, partying, sports, hobbies, destinations, and anything else; and the latest, or even the traditional, heroes and icons of the western worlds of music, sports, films, fashion, business, history, politics, etc. If some of these aspects are current only among elite classes, they have produced Indian clones which cater to the other classes. All this progressive westernisation (or Americanisation) and de-Indianisation of greater and greater numbers of Indians, and particularly of the younger generations, is slowly leading to the demise of more and more aspects of India’s culture. Several people, including western scholars, have repeatedly expressed their acute distress at the fatal neglect of their rich culture by Indians. For example, Dr. James O’Barnhill , retired Professor of Theatre Arts, Brown University, USA, in an interview to the Organiser (5/3/1989), lamented: “ I am sad to note that Indians know very little about their folk arts or the artistes … using this medium (TV) to destroy one’s own originality and to spread foreign culture is dangerous … the intellectuals … should recognise the fact that their own culture is dissolving like delta in the sea ”. [This, it may be noted, was in the days of Doordarshan, when private and foreign TV channels had not yet arrived on the scene]. When he had visited Gujarat some years earlier, he had met a Bhavai folk drama artiste who knew 200 plays. But, this time, the oldest Bhavai artiste knew only 65 plays: “ Between two generations, 135 Bhavais were lost! Nobody bothered to record them. They were lost forever ”. This was in 1989. What must be the fate of the traditional Bhavais today, in 2004? And what will be their fate in, say, 2014? And it is not just a question of one particular form of traditional folk theatre, it is a question of literally millions of aspects of Indian culture which are being allowed to die out, or being systematically decimated, at a break-neck pace. The question may be asked: does all this really matter ? After all, change is in the nature of things, so why bother about what may be part of a natural process of change? And there are many more important things to achieve, and problems to solve, in this world; so why interfere with what may be part of the process of progress and development? Well, the facts of the case have been set out, in short but (I hope) comprehensively, in the above pages. To sum up, we have two basic facts: one , Indian culture is the greatest and richest culture in the world , and also the culture which represents the oldest continuous civilisation; and, two , this culture is being systematically decimated, or callously allowed to die out . So, the answer to the first question is: yes, it matters. It matters very much, and it matters almost more than anything else in the world. On a personal level, of course, it is natural, and perfectly right , for every individual to be more concerned with problems that beset him personally. But, on a larger level, this matters more than anything else. As to the second point, it is true that change is a part of nature, and this applies to culture as well. No-one lives his life, in every way, exactly in the same manner that his grandfather lived before him – and, nor must his grandfather have done so before him. But such natural cultural changes (apart from purely technological changes) take place in the culture of a society over the course of time, during which (apart from desirable changes wrought by internal processes of evolution and refinement) the natural influences of other cultures are assimilated into the native ethos. Culture everywhere has been, and should be , a process of give and take; and even as Indian culture has contributed more to the world than any other culture, it has received a great deal from the world as well: to take just a single example, consider the extremely important position of potatoes and chillies, natives of the American continent, in Indian cuisine. [But even in these natural circumstances, a conscious and self-respecting society, with a rich culture of its own, should see to it that this leads to the enrichment, and not to the replacement, abandonment or pollution , of any aspect of its culture. And where, for some reason or the other, some aspect of culture dies out, it should be recorded in detail for future reference and use. The tragedy of Indian culture is that, in spite of the fact that the aspects of its culture, which are being callously allowed to die out, are so rich and beautiful, no efforts are made to record them for posterity.] But, what we are seeing here is not a natural process of change as described above. We are seeing the most powerful forces of Imperialism that the world has ever seen, the forces of American Imperialism, out to transform the world in its own image, and in the process destroying all other cultures with the help of its powerful ideological weapons (Proselytisation, Capitalism and Consumerism), and the world is too overwhelmed, by the psychological force of these weapons, to resist, or even to care. There is nothing “natural” about it. As to the final point, there are many very important (as distinct from more important) things to be achieved, and problems to be solved, in this world; but surely it cannot be anyone’s contention that they will be achieved, or solved, by destroying rich cultural traditions, or allowing them to be destroyed? And why should the destruction, of rich, and beautiful, cultural traditions, be, in any possible way, a part of the process of progress and development? Or, again, why should cultural westernisation, or Americanisation, be equated with the process of progress and development? In the past, much evil, injustice and damage has been done in the name of religion; but even more evil, injustice and damage has been done, and is being done even now on an ever-increasing scale, in the name of progress and development. As a result of many of the half-baked, ill-thought of, or plainly mercenary, things which take place in the name of progress and development, the world not only becomes vastly poorer of large parts of its rich heritage, which is lost forever, but it often has to pay a heavy price for it (the lethal effects of deforestation, industrial pollution, and mega-urbanisation, for example, are already apparent; and will become so clear in the days to come, that even the most determined opponent of social and environmental concerns will be compelled to note them; by when, of course, it will be too late, since some things become irreversible after a point of time), and the results, even otherwise, are often pathetic, tragic and depressing: An article by Soutik Biswas , “ Modern Cultural Clashes ” ( Asiaweek , 5/3/1999), details the results of a decade of efforts, by governmental agencies, at “improving the lot” of the Andamanese tribals, by way of social and welfare policies and programs. The government, in the initial days, had followed a more or less “hands-off” policy: regular contacts with the, till then practically isolated, tribes began in 1974, but they were sporadic and primary. After 1990, the contact expeditions became a regular affair: “ In one case, Indian politician BP Singhal led a parliamentary committee to the tribal heartland, met some people wandering on the trunk road, offered them toffees, suggested giving them raincoats, and asked them to pose for photographs ”. In 1997, “ officials brought a young tribe member to the capital of Port Blair for medical treatment. He spent three months convalescing in the hospital, where he was put up in a separate cabin outfitted with a TV. Doctors and authorities lavished him with attention and gifts, they took him on drives, gave him special food. ” This boy “ carried back the tales of the good life in the city to other tribe members”. The article describes the results: within one year, from October 1997, more than 2000 tribals had migrated out from their habitats, lured by the fairy tales; and a sordid sequence of events, described in the article, took place over the next one-and-a-half years, as the tribals stepped out from backwardness into the modern age. The article, published in March 1999 ( already more than five years ago ), concludes : “Now it may be too late to ensure the tribe members live in a protected environment. Recently, those who landed in Shantanu village were wearing dirty donated clothes, eating fried snacks and rice, and singing popular Hindi ditties they had learned from watching television. On the trunk road that cuts through their heartland, others were stopping vehicles to ask for food. ‘At this rate’, says Acharya [head of the Port Blair-based Society for Andaman and Nicobar Ecology], ‘they will turn up as beggars and servants and prostitutes.’ That would surely be a sorry epitaph for one of the world’s proudest hunter-gatherer tribes. ” The tragedy, described above is so great that no words can even begin to describe it. It will not be an exaggeration to say that the day on which the last of the Andamanese tribals breathes his last breath will be one of the blackest days in our modern human history, in more ways than one. Indian culture will be very much the poorer, by one of its three native races and by one of its six native language families, apart from the different other aspects, most of them probably unrecorded, of Andamanese culture (although I recall seeing a Films Division documentary, “ Man in Search of Man ”, long ago on Doordarshan, which provided some glimpses of Andamanese culture, including some strains of their music). But, apart from that, it will show how “progress and development” can be as ruthless as “religion”: if the natives of Tasmania were ruthlessly wiped out from the face of this earth, in mediaeval times, in the fanatical name of religion, the natives of the Andaman islands will have been ruthlessly wiped out from the face of this earth, in modern times, in the mindless name of progress and development. Moreover, it will also show how far the world has progressed since those mediaeval times: the world, today, is just as blissfully ignorant of, or (even if it were to be brought to their notice) callously indifferent to, the fate of the Andamanese, as it was, then, to the fate of the Tasmanians. The tragedy in the Andaman islands is a pointer to what is happening to India’s tribal and folk cultures, and even to the tributaries of the mainstream classical cultures of India. Even if the analogy may not be an exact one for many reasons, the sight of millions of Indians abandoning their glorious culture, and striving to become pathetic clones of the west, is not very different, in principle and substance, from the pathetic sight of the Andamanese tribals “ wearing dirty donated clothes, eating fried snacks and rice, and singing popular Hindi ditties they had learned from watching television ”. If Indian culture faces the same fate as the culture of the Andamanese tribes, it will be a historical tragedy of indescribable proportions. The only thing which can avert this tragedy is Indian society in general waking up to a consciousness of its roots, and deciding that the survival of Indian culture, in all its richness, really matters more than anything else. Even the survival of Indian society as Hindu society, in my opinion, is incidental to the survival of Indian culture in all its richness: if Hindu society is willing to let it die out, or be polluted or decimated, and prefers to itself survive, howsoever richly and prosperously , as a cultural clone, even a “proudly Hindu” one (whatever that may mean under those circumstances), of whichever society (currently it is western society in general, and American in particular) is dominating the world at the moment, then Hindu society itself deserves to perish “unwept, unhonoured and unsung”. What India requires is a Nationalist ideology in which the need to protect, preserve and perpetuate Indian culture, in all its richness, is a central point of faith and action. As pointed out in the very beginning of this section, Hindutva without Indian culture as its very basis is a meaningless exercise. As I pointed out even earlier, in the Voice of India volume, “ Time for Stock Taking ” (1997, pp.227-8), a true Hindutvavadi should feel deep pain and impelled to take strong action, not only when he hears of issues of conventional Hindutva discourse, but also “ when he hears that the Andamanese races and languages are becoming extinct; that vast tracts of forests, millions of years old, are being wiped out forever; that ancient and mediaeval Hindu architectural monuments are being vandalised, looted or fatally neglected; that priceless ancient documents are being destroyed or left to rot and decay; that innumerable forms of arts and handicrafts, architectural styles, plant and animal species, musical forms and musical instruments, etc. are becoming extinct; that our sacred rivers and environment are being irreversibly polluted and destroyed …..”. [Incidentally, even as I was typing this out, I noticed a truly, and incredibly, macabre coincidence: the above volume was published in October 1997; the introduction is dated 16 October 1997. The Asiaweek article (dt. March 5, 1999) quoted earlier, relates that the very first incident in which the Andamanese tribals started migrating out of their isolated habitats, to their eternal doom, took place on 21 October 1997.] Hindutva is not a narrow ideology. As I clarified in an interview to the Free Press Journal , 5/5/2002: “ Indian culture being the greatest and richest is not a narrow or chauvinistic idea; it is a demonstrable fact. It would be chauvinistic if it acquired an imperialist tinge: that other cultures are inferior and Indian culture must dominate over or replace them. In fact, I am opposed to even internal cultural imperialism. The idea that Vedic or Sanskrit culture represents Indian culture and that other cultures within India are its subcultures and must be incorporated into it, is wrong ….. all other cultures native to this land: the culture of the Andaman islanders, the Nagas, the Mundas, the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, etc. are all Indian in their own right. They don’t have to be – and should not be – Sanskritised to make them Indian ”. Vedic and Classical Sanskrit culture, is , of course, the pan-Indian representative face of India’s ancient civilisation, and that fact is not negated by the equally valid fact that all other native Indian cultures must be given their due. [I will go further here. In my 1993 book, “ the Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism ” (p.33), I have, rightly in that context, criticised the secularist media for the “ calculated glorification of Urdu, of Lucknowi tehzib , of the Mughals, of gazals and qawwalis , etc. ”. But the truth is that all this is also a part, and a rich part, of our modern Indian ethos. In fact, it is old classics, which depict this culture, that I most look forward to when old Hindi film classics are shown on TV channels!]. And it is not only in the negative sense – of not being cultural imperialist – that Hindutva stands out against cultural imperialism. In the above volume (“ Time for Stock Taking ”, p.227), I put it as follows: “ Hinduism is the name for the Indian territorial form of worldwide Sanatanism (call it Paganism in English). The ideology of Hindutva should therefore be a Universal ideology: …[it] should spearhead a worldwide revival, rejuvenation and resurgence of spiritualism, and of all the religions and cultures which existed all over the world before the advent of imperialist ideologies …”. Perhaps a rather ambitious idea, when the going is increasingly getting tougher, by the day, in India itself – but, nevertheless, that must be the ultimate dream of Hindutva. Finally, Hindutva is not opposed to any other particular culture as such: it is opposed to cultural imperialism which leads to the imposition of one culture to the detriment of others; it is opposed to the destruction and extinction of rich, diverse and beautiful aspects of the rich cultural heritage of mankind. Western, or even American, culture, are not, in themselves, enemies of Hindutva: they have assumed that position today because (religious and cultural) Proselytisation, Capitalism and Consumerism are, today, the weapons of American Imperialism; and the havoc and the destruction they are causing, to the cultural heritage of India and the rest of the world, is lethal and irreversible. The true cultural spirit of Hinduism is encapsulated in the following words of Mahatma Gandhi: “ I don’t want my house to be walled in on all sides and my windows to be stuffed. I want the cultures of all lands to be blown about my house as freely as possible. But I refuse to be blown off my feet by any ”. The tragedy today is that the culture of only one land is being allowed to blow about; and it is not a wind, but a whirlwind; and it is being allowed to blow everyone off their feet, never to stand up again. The aim of Hindutva should, therefore, be to see to it that India remains firmly and proudly rooted in its own richly diverse culture, even as the cultures of all lands (including America as much as every other ) blow freely about in the true Hindu spirit: Hindu individuals, thinkers and activists, should: (1) take up the task of identifying the different fields of culture, and (2) set up well-funded and systematically organised apex institutions, one in every single field (eg. music, dance, cuisine, architecture,
Fabulous! Top class customer service
We stayed for 2 nights, for a family vacation with our 5-year kid and were impressed in every aspects, starting from airport transport to checked-out. nThe hotel is located at a distant of about 25km (30min drive) from airport, on the bay of Bambolim, North Goa. nWe booked one bay view room, on ground floor. The room was beautiful, spacious, neat and clean with an awesome bathroom. The green lawn just outside the room with stunning beach view was just exceptional. nThe hotel has a clean private beach, with lot of water activities like fun boat, kayaks ride, windsurfing etc. With an awesome spa, casino, 3 outdoor and 1 indoor pools, we enjoyed the whole stay amazingly without going out of the hotel campus. nThe most important, the hotel has incredible, exceptional team of people to take care round the clock which makes it a truly 5 star property. nYou must try the different dining options in the hotel. We dined at the Indian cuisine restaurant Chulha, Italian restaurant The Verandah and all-day-dining restaurant The Dining Room. Everywhere the food was actually delicious with an enormously vast buffet breakfast at The dining Room. nnIn a word it’s a truly five start property with fantastic people around. Highly recommended.n
The first class curry house on a quiet Stockport street – Copper Lounge, Hazel Grove, reviewed – Emily Heward
Get the biggest What’s On
It’s a tradition by now about as British as a pint down the pub or a fish and chip supper – but the curry house is under threat.
Across the country, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi restaurants are closing at a rate of around two a week – and some predictions estimate half could close within 10 years as a perfect storm of staff shortages, ailing high streets and changing tastes takes effect.
Manchester’s Curry Mile is a case in point. By the 90s and early 2000s, it’s been estimated – and perhaps exaggerated – that there were more than 50 curry houses along the not-quite-a-mile strip of Wilmslow Road that runs through Rusholme. At the last count there were just eight left.
Successive generations have moved on from the family businesses established by their parents and grandparents, and skilled labour from specialist South Asian chefs has become hard – and expensive – to come by as immigration rules have tightened.
At the same time horizons have broadened, palates have changed. Customers are are no longer content with mix-and-match meats slopped in the same vat of sauce.
It’s adapt or die, and this natural selection has left diners with fewer – but better – choices.
A new wave of Indian restaurants are reinventing the curry house with a sharper focus and higher standards: places like Cheadle’s rightly raved-about Indian Tiffin Room and Lily’s in Ashton-under-Lyne . Remaining relatively under the radar, but rivalling either, is Copper Lounge in Hazel Grove.
Housed in a low-slung, boxy building on an uninspiring parade of shops wedged off a semi-rural strip of Jacksons Lane, it’s not a location with much in the way of passing trade, except from the Three Bears pub next door. (Image: Manchester Evening News)
Yet the word-of-mouth mill has been turning, and it’s been steadily gaining a loyal following since 2015. Because this is a restaurant you want to tell people about.
Opened by three friends who met while working for Marriott International, the restaurant originally centred around the specialities of their native Mumbai, Delhi and Goa.
Now its menu meanders along a more scenic route, taking in the best of the rest of the country’s cuisine along the way.
From Mumbai come street snacks like sabudhana wada (£5), crisp potato patties popping with peanuts and pearls of tapioca – that most loathed of British school pudding ingredients. A mouthful of these, dunked in sticky tamarind chutney, and all is forgiven.
Kashmiri lamb chops are marinated for 24 hours in yoghurt, mustard oil and spices then blasted in a tandoor, until gnarled and blackened at the edges and still ripe and rosy within. Three burly chops here cost £6.50. At the city centre’s much-hyped Dishoom , two much punier pieces cost me £4.30 a pop. I know which I’d rather eat again. View gallery
An Indo-Chinese corner of the menu includes dishes like chilli chicken (£5), tossed with peppers in a sweet, sour gloop laced with soy – perhaps a shake too much – and star anise.
Exercising a little more restraint is a portion of fish Amritsari (£5.50). Four meaty morsels of fish are fried in a graphene-thin batter speckled with coriander seeds. There’s a delicate heat to it, dialled up by a daub of green chutney prickling with green chilli, coriander, white pepper and cumin.
Curries span the subcontinent, from Delhi staples such as butter chicken to seafood specialities from the coast of Goa and Malvan. A south Indian prawn curry (£12.95) crackles with curry leaves and black pepper, with a gentle hum of green chilli and ginger in the tomato sauce. Curry leaf prawns (Image: Manchester Evening News)
There’s a hint of sweetness too, from kokum. I know this because the staff know this. They’re versed in every minutiae of the menu and there’s nothing I ask about the food that they can’t answer on the spot.
Sides provide a strong supporting cast, from the lentil and mustard seed-stippled lemon rice (£3.95) to the loaf tins of blistered, ghee-glistening naan (£3.50).
Desserts are worth saving room for too: no Punky Penguins here, but a handful of traditional sweets such as falooda, kulfi and a sweet, earthy gajar halwa (£4.95), a cardamom-perfumed pile of grated carrot and cashews, simmered in milk until soft and spongy and topped with a scoop of pistachio-dusted ice cream.
The only thing lacking on the night we visit is they’ve entirely run out of bottled beers, from a thoughtful list that showcases Stockport’s Thirst Class Ales and Bollington Brewery.
We make do with a couple of pints of Jhakaas IPA (£5.20) – an overly carbonated, not-quite-hoppy-enough attempt at an India Pale Ale that I’d struggle to distinguish from any of their other draught beers.
Still, the fact they’ve bothered to source some local beers at all makes it a cut above your average curry house. As is everything about this place.
Aside from the odd naff decorative flourish (hello pulsing LED specials boards), everything from the hammered copper tableware and mottled verdigris paintwork to the laid-back world fusion soundtrack shows as much pride in the surroundings as there is in the food and service.
And they should be proud: Copper Lounge is pure gold. How we rated it
Fatt Pundit Review
May 30, 2019
Fatt Pundit is an Indo Chinese restaurant in Soho . Fatt Pundit aims to merge traditional Chinese cooking techniques with Indian spices and ingredients. We love Indian food and really enjoy Chinese food so were really excited to eat at Fatt Pundit. We were also really excited because we’d been on a hiatus from “foodie-ing” while I completed my law school exams. I’m done now (well, almost) so we’re back!
Fatt Pundit is in Berwick Street, right in the heart of Soho. It’s really casual, and uniquely so. It’s stripped back, with a modern rustic vibe. The service is also relaxed but very attentive and friendly (everyone had a smile 😊).
Now, the food… Food
The menu is not exhaustive, but then every dish is intriguing. We had to curb our enthusiasm and not order the entire menu. Momo’s
Momos are dumplings… we love dumplings, Shiima especially. So ordered the chicken, beef, and kid goat. Kid goat momo Beef momo Chicken momo
They were all delicious, but the chicken and kid goat were standout. The filling in both were very saucy and well spiced 👌🏾. Veg Crackling Spinach
The crackling spinach was a tad too sweet for me, but Shiima really enjoy it. It tasted very similar well done chaats we enjoyed recently. Seafood Bombay chilli prawns
The Bombay Chilly Prawns were awesome. And boy, were they spicy. A tad sticky too, and the prawns were large and meaty. Meat, Game + Poultry Lollypop chicken
The lollypop chicken were just great. Simply the best “lollipop chicken” we’ve had, and we didn’t expect it to be so delicious because it was fried. But then it wasn’t oily or too crispy… it was just perfectly cooked and seasoned. Barrah lamb chops
The Barrah Lamb Chops were so tender that it just melt in your mouth. Plus, it was really well spiced with masala. Manchrian Chicken
Shiima ordered the egg Szechuan fried rice to eat with the Manchurian chicken and the rice looked so mouthwatering that we forgot to take a picture 😂. And it was really delicious as well. As you might know if you’ve read any of our previous posts, I don’t eat rice expect on sushi but I absolutely devoured this. The Manchurian chicken was awesome too. The sauce was very rich and spicy and the chicken was immersed in its flavour. Shredded Chilly Venison
The shredded chilly venison was similar in a way to the Manchurian chicken, but less saucy and obviously with a very different taste of tender venison. It came with a fluffy bao bun which we enjoyed with the venison and the Manchurian chicken. Dessert Sizzling Brownie
We ordered the sizzling brownie to share and enjoyed it. The brownie and the warm chocolate sauce weren’t too sweet, and the ice cream was decent. Verdict
We really enjoyed our dinner experience at Fatt Pundit. We couldn’t have hoped for a better dinner after almost a month away from our foodie adventures. The food is fantastic, the vibe is relaxing, and the service is very friendly. We recommend for casual dates and a unique meal with friends, family, or colleagues. Fatt Pundit is fairly inexpensive as well.
Cuisine: Indo Chinese (Indian-Chinese Fusion)Dress Code: CasualShiima’s Star Dish: Lollypop ChickenAmen’s Star Dish: Egg Szechuan Fried RicePrice: £20-£30pp
Evolution of the adventurous Indian traveller – Mail Today News
Suket Dhir, fashion designer There was a time when the only experience for an Indian traveller was to visit the place they’d either heard of or read in books. They would not just shy away from experimenting new cuisines, they’d only stick to what was safe. But a lot has changed. The new-age Indian traveller seeks everything, ranging from fun, food, fashion, and entertainment, in their travel experience. This was the theme for the session on Fun, Food, Fashion and Entertainment: Destination Indians Prefer, at the 5th Mail Today Tourism Summit. Chef Manish Mehrotra of Indian Accent recalled, Ten years back, food was a major hindrance for Indians while travelling abroad. Now, the new generation is willing to try new things, especially food. And they are also helping the older generation experiment more. Fashion designer Suket Dhir added, India is the mecca for vegetarians; and with veganism picking up, it’s obvious to take references from here.
The panelists also agreed on how travel for Indians now goes beyond sight seeing. Dhir associates his memorable journeys with the people he meets, Travel will always be about the memories I make with people I meet. Fashion designer Anupamaa Dayal, on the other hand, defined travel as a raw encounter, stating, When you travel, you come back with love, learning, raw experiences, Instagrammable pictures, and souvenirs. Mehrotra added to this point, saying, The only things you get back after travel are souvenirs and memories.
These stay with you for life. Souvenirs, to Dayal, would mean pieces created by local artisans, When you buy local textiles, you come back with the emotional resonance of the land through the drape you wear.
Fashion designer Rahul Mishra mentioned how, with changing times, people are not just looking for food options but shopping experience too. What you buy is a relevant part of the immersive experience you have at a destination. Mishra added, Five years back people would shop from Zara when abroad. Now, they look at what new can you get there. In all, the panel concluded at a note that spoke about a 360 degree experience local cuisines, local shopping, and more as far as travel goes. As Dayal said, “It’s about escapism. It should help add a dimension to us as well.
Get real-time alerts and all the news on your phone with the all-new India Today app. Download from Post your comment
Veda Modern Indian Bistro
May 22, 2019 Veda Modern Indian Bistro
At Veda Modern Indian Bistro the menu’s focus is traditional North Indian cuisine served to share in an edgy and modern dining room, accompanied by a full bar offering wine, draft beer, and a unique craft cocktail program.
Veda is an authentic Indian restaurant in Philadelphia offering North-Indian Dishes. Here, at Veda we value our customers and believe that our customer’s satisfaction is our pleasure Fresh and Healthy Ingredients: The chef himself gets the ingredients that go into everyday food directly from the farmer’s market, assuring that each item selected is of premium quality. Good Quality and Ethically Sourced Spices: Indian Spices that are used in food preparation are authentic and ethically sourced, imported straight from India. Comfortable and Causal Environment: The ambience at Veda is comfortable and great for you to dine with your family, kids and even in groups. You may like to make a prior reservation if you would like to dine in a larger group.
Veteran Chef Vipul Bhasin boasts more than 25 years of experience and also runs Coriander and Indiya in Collingswood, NJ. And in partnership with owner Inder Singh, a former engineer-turned-restaurateur, they have a great space in Veda.
owner Inder Singh (an engineer turned restaurateur) and veteran chef Vipul Bhasin are making food that is of-the-moment, authentic but not hyper-traditional. “I wanted to represent my generation and give a cool new face to Indian cuisine,” said co-owner Inder Singh, 32, a South Jersey-raised native of Mumbai. “Something different from the mom-and-pop shops with buffet-style service that everyone already knows.” “we keep everything at the lowest spice level,” says Singh – they’ve sacrificed the bold flavors and character that help make Indian cooking so thrilling to begin with. the sauces at Veda, with their full loads of earthy, nutty, sharp, bright, hot, sweet Indian spices, were thick and rich but never oily. Bhasin, who’s a busy guy still running the kitchens at his other restaurants, Coriander and Indiya in Collingswood, says the creaminess on his menu can be deceptive. He’s cut back on actual cream in favor of pureed nuts, onions, and other thickeners for texture.
Highfalutin lighting fixtures aside, lunches are informal, fast and cheap, served on brass thali platters. There are fluffy haystacks of basmati rice, sides, toppings, extras, so that the rogan josh arrives with a somewhat gritty lentil stew and maybe some papadum, each in its own little bowl, while the Goan shrimp (not spicy enough off the rack to do justice to the regional appellation, though, to the kitchen’s credit, I was offered an option to have it made hotter) gets paired with delicious channa in a smoky curry gravy, more pappadum, plus a couple of crispy chickpea fritters.
Dinner at Veda expands greatly over lunch’s efficiency, covering everything from street food like ragda and samosa to kebabs from the tandoor and poached skate wing with Malabar tamarind and sweet and spicy red chili from Kashmir — a reminder of the breadth of Indian cuisine, the depth. Veda offers a dining experience to satisfy all aspects of fine cuisine accompanied by a full bar offering wine, draft beer, and a unique craft cocktail program. While wines are selected from many different regions and are carefully chosen to complement our cuisine, we also provide an extensive selection of whiskies and expertly crafted signature cocktails that feature fine spirits and techniques. Jadoo Maker Marks, Toasted Cinnamon Stick, Spiced Pear Syrup, Lemon Juice Majnu (Maj•Noo) Knob Creek Rye, Mango Pulp, Egg White, Angostura BittersChilli Powder Happy Hour Mon-Fri : 5:00PM – 7:00PM and Sat-Sun : 6:00PM – 8:00PM
$7 Cocktails including Old Fashioned $7 Jim Beam Black / Grand Marnier / Green Chartreuse / Turbinado Syrup / Angostura & Orange Bitters / Orange Zest, Laila $7 Cucumber Infused Effen Vodka / St. Germain / Mint Syrup / Lime Juice / Peychauds Bitters, Mumbai Mule $7 Belvedere Unfiltered / Cardomon / Ginger / Lime / Ginger Beer and Rani Gin / Elderflower Liqueur / Sweet Vermouth
Wines are offered for $5 and Beer for $4
Discounted Snacks include Chicken Roti-Pe-Boti Taco $6 Chicken / Paprika / Burnt Ginger / Roasted Peppers / Pickled Onions / Achari Mayo The Calcutta pork ribs were tender and tasty in their sweet mango glaze, Malabar Fish Fry $5 Yogurt / Ginger-Garlic / Black Salt / Coriander, Paneer Masala Taco $6 Cottage Cheese / Turmeric / Ginger / Roasted Peppers / Pickled Onions / Achari Mayo, Desi Tadka Lentil Rissotto $5 Basmati / Split Mung Lentils / Roasted Peanuts / Mustard / Heing, Goan Crab Cake $5 Masala Crab Cakes / Tomato Panch-Phoran Chutney, and more. Dinner Crispy Baby Spinach / Shallots / Tomatoes / Spiced Yogurt / Tamarind & Date Chutney ‘ Masala Hummus Platter (V)